Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(659)

Issue 10967064: Split test/mjsunit/math-floor into smaller chunks (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 3 months ago by Jakob Kummerow
Modified:
8 years, 3 months ago
Reviewers:
Yang
CC:
v8-dev
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Split test/mjsunit/math-floor into smaller chunks Committed: https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=12588

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+86 lines, -345 lines) Patch
D test/mjsunit/math-floor.js View 1 chunk +0 lines, -159 lines 0 comments Download
A + test/mjsunit/math-floor-part1.js View 2 chunks +1 line, -72 lines 0 comments Download
A + test/mjsunit/math-floor-part2.js View 1 chunk +42 lines, -16 lines 0 comments Download
A + test/mjsunit/math-floor-part3.js View 2 chunks +1 line, -82 lines 0 comments Download
A + test/mjsunit/math-floor-part4.js View 1 chunk +42 lines, -16 lines 2 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
Jakob Kummerow
PTAL. No lines were actually added or removed. I had to duplicate the tests' header ...
8 years, 3 months ago (2012-09-24 08:58:51 UTC) #1
Yang
LGTM with suggestion. http://codereview.chromium.org/10967064/diff/1/test/mjsunit/math-floor-part4.js File test/mjsunit/math-floor-part4.js (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/10967064/diff/1/test/mjsunit/math-floor-part4.js#newcode76 test/mjsunit/math-floor-part4.js:76: assertEquals(-0, floorsum(100000, -0)); It seems that ...
8 years, 3 months ago (2012-09-24 09:19:26 UTC) #2
Jakob Kummerow
8 years, 3 months ago (2012-09-24 09:31:21 UTC) #3
http://codereview.chromium.org/10967064/diff/1/test/mjsunit/math-floor-part4.js
File test/mjsunit/math-floor-part4.js (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/10967064/diff/1/test/mjsunit/math-floor-part4....
test/mjsunit/math-floor-part4.js:76: assertEquals(-0, floorsum(100000, -0));
On 2012/09/24 09:19:26, Yang wrote:
> It seems that this part has been added in r8877 as a regression test. Maybe
you
> want to make this a separate file to make it stand apart?

As discussed offline, let's leave this where it is. It doesn't take long to run,
and we don't have a bug number for it.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698