Fixing up measurement test.

lib/html/src/dart2js_MutationObserverSupported.dart

Index: lib/html/src/dart2js_MutationObserverSupported.dart
diff --git a/pkg/intl/example/basic/basic_example_runner.dart b/lib/html/src/dart2js_MutationObserverSupported.dart
similarity index 50%
copy from pkg/intl/example/basic/basic_example_runner.dart
copy to lib/html/src/dart2js_MutationObserverSupported.dart
index 004a5b286dc54401697cc3e6b92ac627594399e7..df239384f2e9ea81332215a6daf033eaefa55184 100644
--- a/pkg/intl/example/basic/basic_example_runner.dart
+++ b/lib/html/src/dart2js_MutationObserverSupported.dart
@@ -3,12 +3,9 @@
 // BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
 
 /**
- * This is just a shell that runs the code in basic_example.dart, leaving
- * that as a library that can also be run by tests.
+ * Checks to see if the mutation observer API is supported on the current
+ * platform.
  */
-
-#import('basic_example.dart');
-
-main() {
-  setup(runProgram, print);
-}
+static bool _isMutationObserverSupported() native '''

[vsm, 2012/09/21 15:12:40]

We should think of a better and user-accessible pattern for this type of check.

[blois, 2012/09/21 17:00:03]

Agree- generalizing a mechanism for checking whether features are supported is
for a later milestone.

+  return !!( window.MutationObserver || window.WebKitMutationObserver);
+''';