Import Polymer 0.8 and several key elements.

Import Polymer 0.8 and several key elements.

BUG=480738
Committed: https://crrev.com/48ec1e78bc5a9cea2a8c1fc36ba845be95031116
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#327125}

[Jeremy Klein, 2015-04-24 02:42:19]

jlklein@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ michaelpg@chromium.org

[Jeremy Klein, 2015-04-24 02:42:22]

Hey Michael,

I know this looks like a huge change, but it's pretty much just an import. The
only files with anything worth reviewing are:

reproduce.sh
extract_inline_scripts.sh
bower.json
README.chromium

The rest is just generated by those for the most part. I'm going to keep a v0_8
subdir for this and cr_elements until everything is switched over and then we
can just do a clean replace.

Thanks!
Jeremy

[michaelpg, 2015-04-25 02:38:04]

Thanks for doing all this work. A few questions/comments.

https://codereview.chromium.org/1082403004/diff/10001/third_party/polymer/v0_...
File third_party/polymer/v0_8/bower.json (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1082403004/diff/10001/third_party/polymer/v0_...
third_party/polymer/v0_8/bower.json:6: "iron-icon":
"PolymerElements/iron-icon#^0.8.0",
Shouldn't we specify exact version numbers?

https://codereview.chromium.org/1082403004/diff/10001/third_party/polymer/v0_...
third_party/polymer/v0_8/bower.json:9: "paper-styles":
"PolymerElements/paper-styles#^0.8.0",
Please style like the current bower.json: newline separators for logical
sections, alphabetized within sections.

https://codereview.chromium.org/1082403004/diff/10001/third_party/polymer/v0_...
File third_party/polymer/v0_8/reproduce.sh (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1082403004/diff/10001/third_party/polymer/v0_...
third_party/polymer/v0_8/reproduce.sh:36: 
does chromium.patch no longer apply because we vulcanize?

https://codereview.chromium.org/1082403004/diff/10001/third_party/polymer/v0_...
third_party/polymer/v0_8/reproduce.sh:40: crisper --source
components-chromium/polymer/polymer.html\
another dependency? should we call it out in the header like we do with
vulcanize?

[Jeremy Klein, 2015-04-25 19:54:07]

https://codereview.chromium.org/1082403004/diff/10001/third_party/polymer/v0_...
File third_party/polymer/v0_8/bower.json (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1082403004/diff/10001/third_party/polymer/v0_...
third_party/polymer/v0_8/bower.json:6: "iron-icon":
"PolymerElements/iron-icon#^0.8.0",
On 2015/04/25 02:38:04, michaelpg wrote:
> Shouldn't we specify exact version numbers?

These are still sort of in flux right now so I think allowing minor version
changes is probably a good thing until they settle down. Otherwise I think it
will be really tricky to keep track of all the version numbers as these elements
get filled out. We'll just need to pay attention when running reproduce.sh.

https://codereview.chromium.org/1082403004/diff/10001/third_party/polymer/v0_...
third_party/polymer/v0_8/bower.json:9: "paper-styles":
"PolymerElements/paper-styles#^0.8.0",
On 2015/04/25 02:38:04, michaelpg wrote:
> Please style like the current bower.json: newline separators for logical
> sections, alphabetized within sections.

Done.

https://codereview.chromium.org/1082403004/diff/10001/third_party/polymer/v0_...
File third_party/polymer/v0_8/reproduce.sh (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1082403004/diff/10001/third_party/polymer/v0_...
third_party/polymer/v0_8/reproduce.sh:36: 
On 2015/04/25 02:38:04, michaelpg wrote:
> does chromium.patch no longer apply because we vulcanize?

I think it just doesn't apply because afaict the line that the patch was
removing doesn't exist anymore. I couldn't find any instances of HTML elements
that would cause the same problem in js comments in 0.8.

https://codereview.chromium.org/1082403004/diff/10001/third_party/polymer/v0_...
third_party/polymer/v0_8/reproduce.sh:40: crisper --source
components-chromium/polymer/polymer.html\
On 2015/04/25 02:38:04, michaelpg wrote:
> another dependency? should we call it out in the header like we do with
> vulcanize?

Good call. Done. FYI, crisper is what splits out the js from the html. That
piece of vulcanize was broken out into its own tool.

[michaelpg, 2015-04-26 00:52:47]

LGTM, thanks for the explanations.

[Jeremy Klein, 2015-04-26 05:19:52]

The CQ bit was checked by jlklein@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-26 05:19:55]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1082403004/20001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-26 05:30:42]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-26 05:30:45]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  android_chromium_gn_compile_dbg on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/android_chromiu...)
  android_chromium_gn_compile_rel on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/android_chromiu...)
  android_compile_dbg on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/android_compile...)
  cast_shell_android on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/cast_shell_andr...)
  cast_shell_linux on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/cast_shell_linu...)
  linux_chromium_chromeos_ozone_rel_ng on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)
  linux_chromium_clobber_rel_ng on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)
  linux_chromium_gn_chromeos_rel on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)
  linux_chromium_gn_dbg on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)
  linux_chromium_gn_rel on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)

[Jeremy Klein, 2015-04-26 06:26:45]

The CQ bit was checked by jlklein@chromium.org

[Jeremy Klein, 2015-04-26 06:26:49]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from
michaelpg@chromium.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/1082403004/#ps30001
(title: "Forgot -f on a git add")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-26 06:27:29]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1082403004/30001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-26 06:38:05]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-26 06:38:07]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  linux_chromium_asan_rel on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)
  linux_chromium_chromeos_compile_dbg_ng on tryserver.chromium.linux
(JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)
  linux_chromium_chromeos_rel_ng on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)

[michaelpg, 2015-04-27 20:32:21]

slgtm

[Jeremy Klein, 2015-04-27 20:35:34]

The CQ bit was checked by jlklein@chromium.org

[Jeremy Klein, 2015-04-27 20:35:35]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from
michaelpg@chromium.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/1082403004/#ps50001
(title: "Also remove polymer/explainer")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-27 20:36:03]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1082403004/50001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-27 21:27:24]

Committed patchset #6 (id:50001)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-27 21:28:24]

Patchset 6 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/48ec1e78bc5a9cea2a8c1fc36ba845be95031116
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#327125}