|
|
Created:
5 years, 8 months ago by Mark Seaborn Modified:
5 years, 8 months ago CC:
chromium-reviews, Derek Schuff, hidehiko, JF, jvoung (off chromium), native-client-reviews_googlegroups.com, petarj, Petr Hosek, shinyak, teravest Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master Project:
chromium Visibility:
Public. |
DescriptionNaCl: Update revision in DEPS, bd095c3 -> 8e69819
This pulls in the following Native Client changes:
36f7841: (petarj@mips.com) [MIPS] Change TEST_IS_LOCK_FREE for 64bit types
c827ec5: (dschuff@chromium.org) Add torture test configs for nacl-clang
7005393: (dschuff@chromium.org) Add missing EH failures exclusion file for clang
9b89306: (teravest@chromium.org) Revert of Remove NACL_BUILD_ARCH_MAP (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1039253003/)
69c5742: (jfb@chromium.org) PNaCl: Update LLVM revision in pnacl/COMPONENT_REVISIONS
57f974d: (dschuff@chromium.org) Update and triage gcc torture known failures
10a7211: (shinyak@chromium.org) Check archive on Windows.
da6385f: (dschuff@chromium.org) PNaCl: Update compiler-rt revision in pnacl/COMPONENT_REVISIONS
0a06a29: (jvoung@chromium.org) Make the torture test known failures for PNaCl a bit stricter.
6a47074: (dschuff@chromium.org) Run compiler_rt test suite on FYI bots
021d15a: (jvoung@chromium.org) PNaCl: Update LLVM revision in pnacl/COMPONENT_REVISIONS
9b7cee1: (sbc@chromium.org) Cleanup libnacl's pthread.h
3a908f6: (sbc@chromium.org) Add pthead_condattr_* function to libpthread
002a793: (dschuff@chromium.org) FYI bot script: Fixes for compiler-rt test suite
5e87ba2: (dschuff@chromium.org) Remove libstdc++ tests from toolchain_tests
4d31bac: (dschuff@chromium.org) Fix breakage from 5e87ba2d2c3376efcec763954b5cb81c332d20d1
d25fdca: (dschuff@chromium.org) PNaCl: Update compiler-rt revision in pnacl/COMPONENT_REVISIONS
0ebde97: (dschuff@chromium.org) Remove libstdc++ support from PNaCl toolchain
9c667ae: (dschuff@chromium.org) Update revision for PNaCl
2ef8b63: (dschuff@chromium.org) Run ARM tests first on the PNaCl toolchain linux64 bot
40b7e45: (dschuff@chromium.org) Run memcpy_move_set test with and without -fno-builtin
11953a3: (phosek@chromium.org) Use depot_tools version of Git on Windows for toolchain build
6863b50: (sbc@chromium.org) Add 'arm_trusted' to the 'nacl_core_sdk' package list
4dfff0b: (jvoung@chromium.org) Have CMake LLVM build share CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS with autoconf (e.g., libc++ flags).
47e9502: (hidehiko@chromium.org) Non-SFI mode: Small update for nacl_helper_nonsfi.
8e69819: (sbc@chromium.org) Add O_EXCL support to sel_ldr open syscall
Changes: https://chromium.googlesource.com/native_client/src/native_client/+log/bd095c3ad5f1f25a9c6f44b7f38cec89383a5c33..8e6981959f76f5480f74b2b4819d3b260b1b2062
BUG=none
TEST=browser_tests and nacl_integration
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_dbg_32_ng,linux_nacl_sdk_build
Committed: https://crrev.com/00471ef5d3d886d71b022ad6eaac317e6c9d5e08
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#325177}
Patch Set 1 #Messages
Total messages: 21 (4 generated)
mseaborn@chromium.org changed reviewers: + dschuff@chromium.org
lgtm
The CQ bit was checked by mseaborn@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1080363002/1
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: linux_arm_compile on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_arm_compi...)
On 2015/04/14 23:51:19, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote: > Try jobs failed on following builders: > linux_arm_compile on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, > http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_arm_compi...) There an existing issue causing the ARM build to fail right now: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=477162 I've got a fix out: https://codereview.chromium.org/1085023003/
The CQ bit was checked by mseaborn@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1080363002/1
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #1 (id:1)
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as https://crrev.com/00471ef5d3d886d71b022ad6eaac317e6c9d5e08 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#325177}
Message was sent while issue was closed.
A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in https://codereview.chromium.org/1089163003/ by bartfab@chromium.org. The reason for reverting is: Breaks check_licenses on Linux: Using base directory: src Checking: src 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/include/X11/Xwindows.h' has non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/include/X11/Xwinsock.h' has non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf-xlib/gdk-pixbuf-xlibrgb.h' has non-whitelisted license 'MPL (v1.1) LGPL (unversioned/unknown version)'.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 14 April 2015 at 21:52, <bartfab@chromium.org> wrote: > A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in > https://codereview.chromium.org/1089163003/ by bartfab@chromium.org. > > The reason for reverting is: Breaks check_licenses on Linux: > > Using base directory: src > Checking: src > > 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/include/X11/Xwindows.h' > has > non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' > 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/include/X11/Xwinsock.h' > has > non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' > 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/ > include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf-xlib/gdk-pixbuf-xlibrgb.h' > has non-whitelisted license 'MPL (v1.1) LGPL (unversioned/unknown > version)'. Is there a Buildbot that runs this check? If so, can you give me the link to the Buildbot run that failed? Is there a trybot that runs the licence check as well? Cheers, Mark To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 14 April 2015 at 21:52, <bartfab@chromium.org> wrote: > A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in > https://codereview.chromium.org/1089163003/ by bartfab@chromium.org. > > The reason for reverting is: Breaks check_licenses on Linux: > > Using base directory: src > Checking: src > > 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/include/X11/Xwindows.h' > has > non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' > 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/include/X11/Xwinsock.h' > has > non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' > 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/ > include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf-xlib/gdk-pixbuf-xlibrgb.h' > has non-whitelisted license 'MPL (v1.1) LGPL (unversioned/unknown > version)'. Is there a Buildbot that runs this check? If so, can you give me the link to the Buildbot run that failed? Is there a trybot that runs the licence check as well? Cheers, Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Native-Client-Reviews" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to native-client-reviews+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to native-client-reviews@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/native-client-reviews. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 04/15/2015 06:44 PM, Mark Seaborn wrote: > On 14 April 2015 at 21:52, <bartfab@chromium.org> wrote: > >> A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in >> https://codereview.chromium.org/1089163003/ by bartfab@chromium.org. >> >> The reason for reverting is: Breaks check_licenses on Linux: >> >> Using base directory: src >> Checking: src >> >> 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/include/X11/Xwindows.h' >> has >> non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' >> 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/include/X11/Xwinsock.h' >> has >> non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' >> 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/ >> include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf-xlib/gdk-pixbuf-xlibrgb.h' >> has non-whitelisted license 'MPL (v1.1) LGPL (unversioned/unknown >> version)'. > > > Is there a Buildbot that runs this check? If so, can you give me the link > to the Buildbot run that failed? Is there a trybot that runs the licence > check as well? Sorry, I have no idea whether there are any trybots or buildbots that run this check. I only saw it fail on the waterfall directly. > > Cheers, > Mark > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Native-Client-Reviews" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to native-client-reviews+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to native-client-reviews@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/native-client-reviews. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 04/15/2015 06:44 PM, Mark Seaborn wrote: > On 14 April 2015 at 21:52, <bartfab@chromium.org> wrote: > >> A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in >> https://codereview.chromium.org/1089163003/ by bartfab@chromium.org. >> >> The reason for reverting is: Breaks check_licenses on Linux: >> >> Using base directory: src >> Checking: src >> >> 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/include/X11/Xwindows.h' >> has >> non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' >> 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/include/X11/Xwinsock.h' >> has >> non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' >> 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/ >> include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf-xlib/gdk-pixbuf-xlibrgb.h' >> has non-whitelisted license 'MPL (v1.1) LGPL (unversioned/unknown >> version)'. > > > Is there a Buildbot that runs this check? If so, can you give me the link > to the Buildbot run that failed? Is there a trybot that runs the licence > check as well? Sorry, I have no idea whether there are any trybots or buildbots that run this check. I only saw it fail on the waterfall directly. > > Cheers, > Mark > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
+Paweł, others to BCC: issue 89099 <https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=98099> leads me to believe he may be able to help figure out why this wasn't caught in presubmit, and how this can be fixed so that CQ fails next time instead of needing a revert. On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Bartosz Fabianowski <bartfab@chromium.org> wrote: > On 04/15/2015 06:44 PM, Mark Seaborn wrote: > >> On 14 April 2015 at 21:52, <bartfab@chromium.org> wrote: >> >> A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in >>> https://codereview.chromium.org/1089163003/ by bartfab@chromium.org. >>> >>> The reason for reverting is: Breaks check_licenses on Linux: >>> >>> Using base directory: src >>> Checking: src >>> >>> 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/ >>> include/X11/Xwindows.h' >>> has >>> non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' >>> 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/ >>> include/X11/Xwinsock.h' >>> has >>> non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' >>> 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/ >>> include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf-xlib/gdk-pixbuf-xlibrgb.h' >>> has non-whitelisted license 'MPL (v1.1) LGPL (unversioned/unknown >>> version)'. >>> >> >> >> Is there a Buildbot that runs this check? If so, can you give me the link >> to the Buildbot run that failed? Is there a trybot that runs the licence >> check as well? >> > > Sorry, I have no idea whether there are any trybots or buildbots that run > this check. I only saw it fail on the waterfall directly. > > >> Cheers, >> Mark >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Native-Client-Reviews" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to native-client-reviews+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to native-client-reviews@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/native-client-reviews. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
+Paweł, others to BCC: issue 89099 <https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=98099> leads me to believe he may be able to help figure out why this wasn't caught in presubmit, and how this can be fixed so that CQ fails next time instead of needing a revert. On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Bartosz Fabianowski <bartfab@chromium.org> wrote: > On 04/15/2015 06:44 PM, Mark Seaborn wrote: > >> On 14 April 2015 at 21:52, <bartfab@chromium.org> wrote: >> >> A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in >>> https://codereview.chromium.org/1089163003/ by bartfab@chromium.org. >>> >>> The reason for reverting is: Breaks check_licenses on Linux: >>> >>> Using base directory: src >>> Checking: src >>> >>> 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/ >>> include/X11/Xwindows.h' >>> has >>> non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' >>> 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/ >>> include/X11/Xwinsock.h' >>> has >>> non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' >>> 'native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/ >>> include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf-xlib/gdk-pixbuf-xlibrgb.h' >>> has non-whitelisted license 'MPL (v1.1) LGPL (unversioned/unknown >>> version)'. >>> >> >> >> Is there a Buildbot that runs this check? If so, can you give me the link >> to the Buildbot run that failed? Is there a trybot that runs the licence >> check as well? >> > > Sorry, I have no idea whether there are any trybots or buildbots that run > this check. I only saw it fail on the waterfall directly. > > >> Cheers, >> Mark >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Note that this was worse than just a revert: The NaCl toolchain is downloaded as a tar file and unpacked into the src/ directory on the build machine. After the revert, even a clobber build did not remove the unpacked files. A trooper had to SSH into each affected bot and clean up by hand. - Bartosz On 04/16/2015 04:10 PM, JF Bastien wrote: > +Paweł, others to BCC: issue 89099 > <https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=98099> leads me to > believe he may be able to help figure out why this wasn't caught in > presubmit, and how this can be fixed so that CQ fails next time instead > of needing a revert. > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Bartosz Fabianowski > <bartfab@chromium.org <mailto:bartfab@chromium.org>> wrote: > > On 04/15/2015 06:44 PM, Mark Seaborn wrote: > > On 14 April 2015 at 21:52, <bartfab@chromium.org > <mailto:bartfab@chromium.org>> wrote: > > A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in > https://codereview.chromium.__org/1089163003/ > <https://codereview.chromium.org/1089163003/> by > bartfab@chromium.org <mailto:bartfab@chromium.org>. > > The reason for reverting is: Breaks check_licenses on Linux: > > Using base directory: src > Checking: src > > 'native_client/toolchain/__linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/__include/X11/Xwindows.h' > has > non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' > 'native_client/toolchain/__linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/__include/X11/Xwinsock.h' > has > non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' > 'native_client/toolchain/__linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/ > include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-__pixbuf-xlib/gdk-pixbuf-__xlibrgb.h' > has non-whitelisted license 'MPL (v1.1) LGPL > (unversioned/unknown > version)'. > > > > Is there a Buildbot that runs this check? If so, can you give > me the link > to the Buildbot run that failed? Is there a trybot that runs > the licence > check as well? > > > Sorry, I have no idea whether there are any trybots or buildbots > that run this check. I only saw it fail on the waterfall directly. > > > Cheers, > Mark > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Native-Client-Reviews" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to native-client-reviews+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to native-client-reviews@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/native-client-reviews. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Note that this was worse than just a revert: The NaCl toolchain is downloaded as a tar file and unpacked into the src/ directory on the build machine. After the revert, even a clobber build did not remove the unpacked files. A trooper had to SSH into each affected bot and clean up by hand. - Bartosz On 04/16/2015 04:10 PM, JF Bastien wrote: > +Paweł, others to BCC: issue 89099 > <https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=98099> leads me to > believe he may be able to help figure out why this wasn't caught in > presubmit, and how this can be fixed so that CQ fails next time instead > of needing a revert. > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Bartosz Fabianowski > <bartfab@chromium.org <mailto:bartfab@chromium.org>> wrote: > > On 04/15/2015 06:44 PM, Mark Seaborn wrote: > > On 14 April 2015 at 21:52, <bartfab@chromium.org > <mailto:bartfab@chromium.org>> wrote: > > A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in > https://codereview.chromium.__org/1089163003/ > <https://codereview.chromium.org/1089163003/> by > bartfab@chromium.org <mailto:bartfab@chromium.org>. > > The reason for reverting is: Breaks check_licenses on Linux: > > Using base directory: src > Checking: src > > 'native_client/toolchain/__linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/__include/X11/Xwindows.h' > has > non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' > 'native_client/toolchain/__linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/__include/X11/Xwinsock.h' > has > non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)' > 'native_client/toolchain/__linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/ > include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-__pixbuf-xlib/gdk-pixbuf-__xlibrgb.h' > has non-whitelisted license 'MPL (v1.1) LGPL > (unversioned/unknown > version)'. > > > > Is there a Buildbot that runs this check? If so, can you give > me the link > to the Buildbot run that failed? Is there a trybot that runs > the licence > check as well? > > > Sorry, I have no idea whether there are any trybots or buildbots > that run this check. I only saw it fail on the waterfall directly. > > > Cheers, > Mark > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org. |