Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(183)

Issue 1080363002: NaCl: Update revision in DEPS, bd095c3 -> 8e69819 (Closed)

Created:
5 years, 8 months ago by Mark Seaborn
Modified:
5 years, 8 months ago
CC:
chromium-reviews, Derek Schuff, hidehiko, JF, jvoung (off chromium), native-client-reviews_googlegroups.com, petarj, Petr Hosek, shinyak, teravest
Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master
Project:
chromium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

NaCl: Update revision in DEPS, bd095c3 -> 8e69819 This pulls in the following Native Client changes: 36f7841: (petarj@mips.com) [MIPS] Change TEST_IS_LOCK_FREE for 64bit types c827ec5: (dschuff@chromium.org) Add torture test configs for nacl-clang 7005393: (dschuff@chromium.org) Add missing EH failures exclusion file for clang 9b89306: (teravest@chromium.org) Revert of Remove NACL_BUILD_ARCH_MAP (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1039253003/) 69c5742: (jfb@chromium.org) PNaCl: Update LLVM revision in pnacl/COMPONENT_REVISIONS 57f974d: (dschuff@chromium.org) Update and triage gcc torture known failures 10a7211: (shinyak@chromium.org) Check archive on Windows. da6385f: (dschuff@chromium.org) PNaCl: Update compiler-rt revision in pnacl/COMPONENT_REVISIONS 0a06a29: (jvoung@chromium.org) Make the torture test known failures for PNaCl a bit stricter. 6a47074: (dschuff@chromium.org) Run compiler_rt test suite on FYI bots 021d15a: (jvoung@chromium.org) PNaCl: Update LLVM revision in pnacl/COMPONENT_REVISIONS 9b7cee1: (sbc@chromium.org) Cleanup libnacl's pthread.h 3a908f6: (sbc@chromium.org) Add pthead_condattr_* function to libpthread 002a793: (dschuff@chromium.org) FYI bot script: Fixes for compiler-rt test suite 5e87ba2: (dschuff@chromium.org) Remove libstdc++ tests from toolchain_tests 4d31bac: (dschuff@chromium.org) Fix breakage from 5e87ba2d2c3376efcec763954b5cb81c332d20d1 d25fdca: (dschuff@chromium.org) PNaCl: Update compiler-rt revision in pnacl/COMPONENT_REVISIONS 0ebde97: (dschuff@chromium.org) Remove libstdc++ support from PNaCl toolchain 9c667ae: (dschuff@chromium.org) Update revision for PNaCl 2ef8b63: (dschuff@chromium.org) Run ARM tests first on the PNaCl toolchain linux64 bot 40b7e45: (dschuff@chromium.org) Run memcpy_move_set test with and without -fno-builtin 11953a3: (phosek@chromium.org) Use depot_tools version of Git on Windows for toolchain build 6863b50: (sbc@chromium.org) Add 'arm_trusted' to the 'nacl_core_sdk' package list 4dfff0b: (jvoung@chromium.org) Have CMake LLVM build share CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS with autoconf (e.g., libc++ flags). 47e9502: (hidehiko@chromium.org) Non-SFI mode: Small update for nacl_helper_nonsfi. 8e69819: (sbc@chromium.org) Add O_EXCL support to sel_ldr open syscall Changes: https://chromium.googlesource.com/native_client/src/native_client/+log/bd095c3ad5f1f25a9c6f44b7f38cec89383a5c33..8e6981959f76f5480f74b2b4819d3b260b1b2062 BUG=none TEST=browser_tests and nacl_integration CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_dbg_32_ng,linux_nacl_sdk_build Committed: https://crrev.com/00471ef5d3d886d71b022ad6eaac317e6c9d5e08 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#325177}

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+1 line, -1 line) Patch
M DEPS View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 21 (4 generated)
Mark Seaborn
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-14 18:28:39 UTC) #2
Derek Schuff
lgtm
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-14 19:58:06 UTC) #3
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1080363002/1
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-14 20:36:39 UTC) #5
commit-bot: I haz the power
Try jobs failed on following builders: linux_arm_compile on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_arm_compile/builds/1584)
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-14 23:51:19 UTC) #7
Sam Clegg
On 2015/04/14 23:51:19, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote: > Try jobs failed on following ...
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-15 01:16:37 UTC) #8
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1080363002/1
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-15 02:38:22 UTC) #10
commit-bot: I haz the power
Committed patchset #1 (id:1)
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-15 02:39:21 UTC) #11
commit-bot: I haz the power
Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as https://crrev.com/00471ef5d3d886d71b022ad6eaac317e6c9d5e08 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#325177}
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-15 02:40:07 UTC) #12
bartfab (slow)
A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in https://codereview.chromium.org/1089163003/ by bartfab@chromium.org. ...
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-15 07:52:51 UTC) #13
Mark Seaborn
On 14 April 2015 at 21:52, <bartfab@chromium.org> wrote: > A revert of this CL (patchset ...
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-15 16:45:14 UTC) #14
Mark Seaborn
On 14 April 2015 at 21:52, <bartfab@chromium.org> wrote: > A revert of this CL (patchset ...
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-15 16:45:16 UTC) #15
bartfab (slow)
On 04/15/2015 06:44 PM, Mark Seaborn wrote: > On 14 April 2015 at 21:52, <bartfab@chromium.org> ...
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-16 12:14:50 UTC) #16
bartfab (slow)
On 04/15/2015 06:44 PM, Mark Seaborn wrote: > On 14 April 2015 at 21:52, <bartfab@chromium.org> ...
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-16 12:14:52 UTC) #17
JF
+Paweł, others to BCC: issue 89099 <https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=98099> leads me to believe he may be able ...
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-16 14:10:23 UTC) #18
JF
+Paweł, others to BCC: issue 89099 <https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=98099> leads me to believe he may be able ...
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-16 14:10:24 UTC) #19
bartfab (slow)
Note that this was worse than just a revert: The NaCl toolchain is downloaded as ...
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-16 14:31:28 UTC) #20
bartfab (slow)
5 years, 8 months ago (2015-04-16 14:31:29 UTC) #21
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Note that this was worse than just a revert:

The NaCl toolchain is downloaded as a tar file and unpacked into the 
src/ directory on the build machine. After the revert, even a clobber 
build did not remove the unpacked files. A trooper had to SSH into each 
affected bot and clean up by hand.

- Bartosz

On 04/16/2015 04:10 PM, JF Bastien wrote:
> +Paweł, others to BCC: issue 89099
> <https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=98099> leads me to
> believe he may be able to help figure out why this wasn't caught in
> presubmit, and how this can be fixed so that CQ fails next time instead
> of needing a revert.
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Bartosz Fabianowski
> <bartfab@chromium.org <mailto:bartfab@chromium.org>> wrote:
>
>     On 04/15/2015 06:44 PM, Mark Seaborn wrote:
>
>         On 14 April 2015 at 21:52, <bartfab@chromium.org
>         <mailto:bartfab@chromium.org>> wrote:
>
>             A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in
>             https://codereview.chromium.__org/1089163003/
>             <https://codereview.chromium.org/1089163003/> by
>             bartfab@chromium.org <mailto:bartfab@chromium.org>.
>
>             The reason for reverting is: Breaks check_licenses on Linux:
>
>             Using base directory: src
>             Checking: src
>
>            
'native_client/toolchain/__linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/__include/X11/Xwindows.h'
>             has
>             non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)'
>            
'native_client/toolchain/__linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/__include/X11/Xwinsock.h'
>             has
>             non-whitelisted license 'BSD MIT/X11 (BSD like)'
>             'native_client/toolchain/__linux_x86/arm_trusted/usr/
>             include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-__pixbuf-xlib/gdk-pixbuf-__xlibrgb.h'
>             has non-whitelisted license 'MPL (v1.1) LGPL
>             (unversioned/unknown
>             version)'.
>
>
>
>         Is there a Buildbot that runs this check?  If so, can you give
>         me the link
>         to the Buildbot run that failed?  Is there a trybot that runs
>         the licence
>         check as well?
>
>
>     Sorry, I have no idea whether there are any trybots or buildbots
>     that run this check. I only saw it fail on the waterfall directly.
>
>
>         Cheers,
>         Mark
>
>
>

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698