Chromium Code Reviews| Index: runtime/vm/raw_object_snapshot.cc |
| =================================================================== |
| --- runtime/vm/raw_object_snapshot.cc (revision 44981) |
| +++ runtime/vm/raw_object_snapshot.cc (working copy) |
| @@ -2751,12 +2751,9 @@ |
| ASSERT(reader != NULL); |
| ASSERT(kind == Snapshot::kMessage); |
| - // Read the length so that we can determine instance size to allocate. |
| - intptr_t len = reader->ReadSmiValue(); |
| - |
| // Allocate JSRegExp object. |
| JSRegExp& regex = JSRegExp::ZoneHandle( |
| - reader->zone(), JSRegExp::New(len, HEAP_SPACE(kind))); |
| + reader->zone(), JSRegExp::New(HEAP_SPACE(kind))); |
| reader->AddBackRef(object_id, ®ex, kIsDeserialized); |
| // Set the object tags. |
| @@ -2770,8 +2767,7 @@ |
| regex.StoreNonPointer(®ex.raw_ptr()->type_flags_, |
| reader->Read<int8_t>()); |
| - // TODO(5411462): Need to implement a way of recompiling the regex. |
| - |
| + // TODO(18854): Need to implement a way of recreating the irrexp functions. |
|
Vyacheslav Egorov (Google)
2015/04/08 23:52:32
I think they can just be written out - lazy compil
Ivan Posva
2015/04/08 23:58:49
Discussing with Siva we would prefer not to send t
|
| return regex.raw(); |
| } |
| @@ -2789,15 +2785,10 @@ |
| writer->WriteIndexedObject(kJSRegExpCid); |
| writer->WriteTags(writer->GetObjectTags(this)); |
| - // Write out the data length field. |
| - writer->Write<RawObject*>(ptr()->data_length_); |
| - |
| // Write out all the other fields. |
| writer->Write<RawObject*>(ptr()->num_bracket_expressions_); |
| writer->WriteObjectImpl(ptr()->pattern_); |
| writer->Write<int8_t>(ptr()->type_flags_); |
| - |
| - // Do not write out the data part which is native. |
| } |