Mark ui_base_unittests target to be used on Swarming.

Mark ui_base_unittests target to be used on Swarming.

Patch generated with the following command line:

$ ./testing/buildbot/manage.py --convert ui_base_unittests

BUG=98637
TEST=trybots?
R=maruel@chromium.org

Committed: https://crrev.com/79e2c2139c83ccc50de4a73288eac94ab13b94f0
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#333991}

[tfarina, 2015-04-05 19:09:31]

Marc-Antoine, can this be done blindly like I did?

I mean, there were some ui_base_unittests entries already marked as
can_use_swarming, but some not, as `./testing/buildbot/manage.py --remaining`
shows.

[tfarina, 2015-04-08 19:24:10]

Marc-Antoine, friendly ping?

[M-A Ruel, 2015-04-09 19:10:31]

Nico, what other builders I should blacklist in manage.py?

https://codereview.chromium.org/1063603002/diff/1/testing/buildbot/chromium.f...
File testing/buildbot/chromium.fyi.json (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1063603002/diff/1/testing/buildbot/chromium.f...
testing/buildbot/chromium.fyi.json:66: "can_use_on_swarming_builders": true
Please remove, I'll have to blacklist this one.

[Nico, 2015-04-09 19:15:27]

thakis@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ thakis@chromium.org

[Nico, 2015-04-09 19:15:27]

I'm only aware of the two clang/win asan bots (shared and static)

[tfarina, 2015-04-09 19:34:22]

https://codereview.chromium.org/1063603002/diff/1/testing/buildbot/chromium.f...
File testing/buildbot/chromium.fyi.json (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1063603002/diff/1/testing/buildbot/chromium.f...
testing/buildbot/chromium.fyi.json:66: "can_use_on_swarming_builders": true
On 2015/04/09 19:10:31, M-A Ruel wrote:
> Please remove, I'll have to blacklist this one.

Done.

[tfarina, 2015-04-10 22:14:55]

Marc-Antoine, ping again??

[M-A Ruel, 2015-04-11 02:15:40]

On 2015/04/10 22:14:55, tfarina wrote:
> Marc-Antoine, ping again??

I didn't forget, don't worry. I just need to clear out the story for which
builders to blacklist, which requires me to reach out to a few people. We also
need to get the rewrite of the batcharchive step in high gear because doing
these kind of changes increases the duration of this step.
 
M-A

[tfarina, 2015-06-11 15:37:03]

Marc-Antoine, should I close/abandon this?

[M-A Ruel, 2015-06-11 17:10:42]

Now that isolate is fast again, lgtm.

[M-A Ruel, 2015-06-11 17:10:46]

The CQ bit was checked by maruel@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-11 17:11:31]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1063603002/20001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-11 18:13:39]

Committed patchset #2 (id:20001)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-11 18:15:50]

Patchset 2 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/79e2c2139c83ccc50de4a73288eac94ab13b94f0
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#333991}

[hans, 2015-06-11 21:57:24]

On 2015/06/11 18:15:50, commit-bot: I haz the power wrote:
> Patchset 2 (id:??) landed as
> https://crrev.com/79e2c2139c83ccc50de4a73288eac94ab13b94f0
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#333991}

I've got red builds now:

http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/CrWinClang%28dbg%29/builds/765
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/ClangToTWin/builds/908
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/ClangToTWin%28dbg%29/builds...
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/ClangToTWin64/builds/912

and there might be more.

[M-A Ruel, 2015-06-11 22:01:34]

On 2015/06/11 21:57:24, hans wrote:
> On 2015/06/11 18:15:50, commit-bot: I haz the power wrote:
> > Patchset 2 (id:??) landed as
> > https://crrev.com/79e2c2139c83ccc50de4a73288eac94ab13b94f0
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#333991}
> 
> I've got red builds now:
> 
>
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/CrWinClang%28dbg%29/builds/765
> http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/ClangToTWin/builds/908
>
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/ClangToTWin%28dbg%29/builds...
> http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/ClangToTWin64/builds/912
> 
> and there might be more.

Ok let's just blacklist the clang builders for now, I'll make a CL.

[Nico, 2015-06-11 22:02:22]

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:01 PM, <maruel@chromium.org> wrote:

> On 2015/06/11 21:57:24, hans wrote:
>
>> On 2015/06/11 18:15:50, commit-bot: I haz the power wrote:
>> > Patchset 2 (id:??) landed as
>> > https://crrev.com/79e2c2139c83ccc50de4a73288eac94ab13b94f0
>> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#333991}
>>
>
>  I've got red builds now:
>>
>
>
>
>
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/CrWinClang%28dbg%29/builds/765
>
>> http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/ClangToTWin/builds/908
>>
>
>
>
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/ClangToTWin%28dbg%29/builds...
>
>> http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/ClangToTWin64/builds/912
>>
>
>  and there might be more.
>>
>
> Ok let's just blacklist the clang builders for now, I'll make a CL.
>

Huh, what, why? What's special about the clang builders? They produce the
same files and should have the same deps – why would this be broken there
but not elsewhere?

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.

[M-A Ruel, 2015-06-11 22:03:42]

On 2015/06/11 22:02:22, Nico wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:01 PM, <mailto:maruel@chromium.org> wrote:
> > Ok let's just blacklist the clang builders for now, I'll make a CL.
> >
> 
> Huh, what, why? What's special about the clang builders? They produce the
> same files and should have the same deps – why would this be broken there
> but not elsewhere?

I don't know yet but let's unblock you and investigate after.

[Nico, 2015-06-11 22:07:37]

A revert of this CL (patchset #2 id:20001) has been created in
https://codereview.chromium.org/1179083002/ by thakis@chromium.org.

The reason for reverting is: Turns "isolate tests" red on some bots, reverting
while maruel investigates:
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/CrWinClang%28dbg%29/builds/....