Chromium Code Reviews| Index: cc/trees/layer_tree_host_unittest_picture.cc |
| diff --git a/cc/trees/layer_tree_host_unittest_picture.cc b/cc/trees/layer_tree_host_unittest_picture.cc |
| index 7d3d5254f4f0d7a25331d78462ae8562a32bd499..6f222f71e719e47a6b44c3675b6e545cface7c8b 100644 |
| --- a/cc/trees/layer_tree_host_unittest_picture.cc |
| +++ b/cc/trees/layer_tree_host_unittest_picture.cc |
| @@ -242,8 +242,8 @@ class LayerTreeHostPictureTestChangeLiveTilesRectWithRecycleTree |
| EXPECT_TRUE(tiling->TileAt(0, 0)); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(tiling->TileAt(0, num_tiles_y)); |
| - // The recycled tiling matches it. |
| - EXPECT_TRUE(recycled_tiling->TileAt(0, 0)); |
| + // The recycled tiling has no tiles. |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(recycled_tiling->TileAt(0, 0)); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(recycled_tiling->TileAt(0, num_tiles_y)); |
| // The live tiles rect matches on the recycled tree. |
| @@ -266,10 +266,6 @@ class LayerTreeHostPictureTestChangeLiveTilesRectWithRecycleTree |
| // either. |
| EXPECT_FALSE(recycled_tiling->TileAt(0, 0)); |
| - // The live tiles rect matches on the recycled tree. |
| - EXPECT_EQ(tiling->live_tiles_rect(), |
| - recycled_tiling->live_tiles_rect()); |
| - |
| // Make the top of the layer visible again. |
| picture_impl->SetPosition(gfx::PointF()); |
| impl->SetNeedsRedraw(); |
| @@ -284,8 +280,8 @@ class LayerTreeHostPictureTestChangeLiveTilesRectWithRecycleTree |
| EXPECT_TRUE(tiling->TileAt(0, 0)); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(tiling->TileAt(0, num_tiles_y)); |
| - // The recycled tiling should also have tiles at the top. |
| - EXPECT_TRUE(recycled_tiling->TileAt(0, 0)); |
| + // The recycled tiling should have no tiles. |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(recycled_tiling->TileAt(0, 0)); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(recycled_tiling->TileAt(0, num_tiles_y)); |
| // The live tiles rect matches on the recycled tree. |
| @@ -308,9 +304,15 @@ class LayerTreeHostPictureTestChangeLiveTilesRectWithRecycleTree |
| PictureLayerTiling* tiling = picture_impl->HighResTiling(); |
| int num_tiles_y = tiling->TilingDataForTesting().num_tiles_y(); |
| - // The pending layer should always have tiles at the top of it each commit. |
| - // The tile is part of the required for activation set so it should exist. |
| - EXPECT_TRUE(tiling->TileAt(0, 0)); |
| + if (!impl->active_tree()->root_layer()) { |
| + // If active tree doesn't have the layer, then pending tree should have |
|
enne (OOO)
2015/04/13 22:36:03
This is the first frame?
vmpstr
2015/04/13 23:52:13
Yes. Did you want me to change the comment to that
|
| + // all needed tiles. |
| + EXPECT_TRUE(tiling->TileAt(0, 0)); |
| + } else { |
| + // Since there was no invalidation, the pending tree shouldn't have any |
| + // tiles. |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(tiling->TileAt(0, 0)); |
| + } |
| EXPECT_FALSE(tiling->TileAt(0, num_tiles_y)); |
| if (did_post_commit_) |