Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(362)

Side by Side Diff: tests/language/if_null_precedence_test.dart

Issue 1045553002: Implement the new '??' operator in analyzer. (Closed) Base URL: https://dart.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge/dart
Patch Set: Fix if_null_precedence_test for unchecked operation. Created 5 years, 8 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch | Annotate | Revision Log
« no previous file with comments | « tests/language/if_null_evaluation_order_test.dart ('k') | tests/language/language.status » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Toggle Intra-line Diffs ('i') | Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
OLDNEW
(Empty)
1 // Copyright (c) 2015, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file
2 // for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
3 // BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
4
5 // Verify that '??' binds tighter than '?:' and less tightly than '||'.
6
7 // SharedOptions=--enable-null-aware-operators
8
9 import "package:expect/expect.dart";
10
11 assertionError(e) => e is AssertionError;
12
13 // Determine whether the VM is running in checked mode.
14 bool get checkedMode {
15 try {
16 var x = 'foo';
17 int y = x;
18 return false;
19 } catch (_) {
20 return true;
21 }
22 }
23
24 main() {
25 // Make sure the "none" test fails if "??" is not implemented. This makes
26 // status files easier to maintain.
27 var _ = null ?? null;
28
29 // "a ?? b ?? c" should be legal, and should evaluate to the first non-null
30 // value (or null if there are no non-null values).
31 Expect.equals(1, 1 ?? 2 ?? 3); /// 01: ok
32 Expect.equals(2, null ?? 2 ?? 3); /// 02: ok
33 Expect.equals(3, null ?? null ?? 3); /// 03: ok
34 Expect.equals(null, null ?? null ?? null); /// 04: ok
35
36 // "a ?? b ? c : d" should parse as "(a ?? b) ? c : d", therefore provided
37 // that a is true, b need not be a bool. An incorrect parse of
38 // "a ?? (b ? c : d)" would require b to be a bool to avoid a static type
39 // warning.
40 Expect.equals(2, true ?? 1 ? 2 : 3); /// 05: ok
41
42 // "a ?? b || c" should parse as "a ?? (b || c)", therefore it's a static
43 // type warning if b doesn't have type bool. An incorrect parse of
44 // "(a ?? b) || c" would allow b to have any type provided that a is bool.
45 Expect.equals(false, false ?? 1 || true); /// 06: static type warning
46
47 // "a || b ?? c" should parse as "(a || b) ?? c", therefore it is a static
48 // type warning if b doesn't have type bool. An incorrect parse of
49 // "a || (b ?? c)" would allow b to have any type provided that c is bool.
50 if (checkedMode) {
51 Expect.throws(() => false || 1 ?? true, assertionError); /// 07: static type warning
52 } else {
53 Expect.equals(false, false || 1 ?? true); /// 07: continued
54 }
55
56 if (checkedMode) {
57 // An incorrect parse of "a || (b ?? c)" would result in no checked-mode
58 // error.
59 Expect.throws(() => false || null ?? true, assertionError); /// 08: ok
60 } else {
61 // An incorrect parse of "a || (b ?? c)" would result in c being evaluated.
62 int i = 0; /// 08: continue d
63 Expect.equals(false, false || null ?? i++ == 0); /// 08: continue d
64 Expect.equals(0, i); /// 08: continue d
65 }
66 }
OLDNEW
« no previous file with comments | « tests/language/if_null_evaluation_order_test.dart ('k') | tests/language/language.status » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698