Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(272)

Issues Search
    My Issues | Starred     Open | Closed | All

Unified Diff: remoting/test/app_remoting_test_driver_environment_unittest.cc

Issue 1037723003: Updated the formatting for the app remoting test driver files using clag-format for consistency. N… (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 5 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « remoting/test/app_remoting_test_driver_environment.cc ('k') | remoting/test/fake_access_token_fetcher.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: remoting/test/app_remoting_test_driver_environment_unittest.cc
diff --git a/remoting/test/app_remoting_test_driver_environment_unittest.cc b/remoting/test/app_remoting_test_driver_environment_unittest.cc
index 97638bf2f0485aef974464db3fdc99971f41af8e..8fd9d49eaa86f765605b544ac0ea8b38475c3128 100644
--- a/remoting/test/app_remoting_test_driver_environment_unittest.cc
+++ b/remoting/test/app_remoting_test_driver_environment_unittest.cc
@@ -26,15 +26,13 @@ using testing::_;
// file system dependencies when testing the TestDriverEnvironment.
class FakeRefreshTokenStore : public RefreshTokenStore {
public:
- FakeRefreshTokenStore() :
- refresh_token_value(kRefreshTokenValue),
- refresh_token_write_succeeded(true),
- refresh_token_write_attempted(false) {}
+ FakeRefreshTokenStore()
+ : refresh_token_value(kRefreshTokenValue),
+ refresh_token_write_succeeded(true),
+ refresh_token_write_attempted(false) {}
~FakeRefreshTokenStore() override {}
- std::string FetchRefreshToken() override {
- return refresh_token_value;
- };
+ std::string FetchRefreshToken() override { return refresh_token_value; };
bool StoreRefreshToken(const std::string& refresh_token) override {
// Record the information passed to us to write.
@@ -70,9 +68,8 @@ TEST(AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironmentTest, InitializeObjectWithAuthCode) {
EXPECT_CALL(mock_access_token_fetcher, GetAccessTokenFromRefreshToken(_, _))
.Times(0);
- AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(
- kUserNameValue,
- kDeveloperEnvironment);
+ AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(kUserNameValue,
+ kDeveloperEnvironment);
environment_object.SetAccessTokenFetcherForTest(&mock_access_token_fetcher);
@@ -83,10 +80,12 @@ TEST(AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironmentTest, InitializeObjectWithAuthCode) {
EXPECT_TRUE(init_result);
EXPECT_TRUE(fake_token_store.refresh_token_write_attempted);
EXPECT_EQ(fake_token_store.refresh_token_value_written.compare(
- kFakeAccessTokenFetcherRefreshTokenValue), 0);
+ kFakeAccessTokenFetcherRefreshTokenValue),
+ 0);
EXPECT_EQ(environment_object.user_name().compare(kUserNameValue), 0);
EXPECT_EQ(environment_object.access_token().compare(
- kFakeAccessTokenFetcherAccessTokenValue), 0);
+ kFakeAccessTokenFetcherAccessTokenValue),
+ 0);
// Attempt to init again, we should not see any additional calls or errors.
init_result = environment_object.Initialize(kAuthCodeValue);
@@ -112,9 +111,8 @@ TEST(AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironmentTest, InitializeObjectWithAuthCodeFailed) {
EXPECT_CALL(mock_access_token_fetcher, GetAccessTokenFromRefreshToken(_, _))
.Times(0);
- AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(
- kUserNameValue,
- kDeveloperEnvironment);
+ AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(kUserNameValue,
+ kDeveloperEnvironment);
environment_object.SetAccessTokenFetcherForTest(&mock_access_token_fetcher);
@@ -140,9 +138,8 @@ TEST(AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironmentTest, InitializeObjectWithRefreshToken) {
EXPECT_CALL(mock_access_token_fetcher, GetAccessTokenFromAuthCode(_, _))
.Times(0);
- AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(
- kUserNameValue,
- kDeveloperEnvironment);
+ AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(kUserNameValue,
+ kDeveloperEnvironment);
environment_object.SetAccessTokenFetcherForTest(&mock_access_token_fetcher);
@@ -160,7 +157,8 @@ TEST(AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironmentTest, InitializeObjectWithRefreshToken) {
// Verify the object was initialized correctly.
EXPECT_EQ(environment_object.user_name().compare(kUserNameValue), 0);
EXPECT_EQ(environment_object.access_token().compare(
- kFakeAccessTokenFetcherAccessTokenValue), 0);
+ kFakeAccessTokenFetcherAccessTokenValue),
+ 0);
// Attempt to init again, we should not see any additional calls or errors.
init_result = environment_object.Initialize(std::string());
@@ -187,9 +185,8 @@ TEST(AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironmentTest,
EXPECT_CALL(mock_access_token_fetcher, GetAccessTokenFromAuthCode(_, _))
.Times(0);
- AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(
- kUserNameValue,
- kDeveloperEnvironment);
+ AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(kUserNameValue,
+ kDeveloperEnvironment);
environment_object.SetAccessTokenFetcherForTest(&mock_access_token_fetcher);
@@ -218,9 +215,8 @@ TEST(AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironmentTest,
EXPECT_CALL(mock_access_token_fetcher, GetAccessTokenFromRefreshToken(_, _))
.Times(0);
- AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(
- kUserNameValue,
- kDeveloperEnvironment);
+ AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(kUserNameValue,
+ kDeveloperEnvironment);
environment_object.SetAccessTokenFetcherForTest(&mock_access_token_fetcher);
@@ -252,9 +248,8 @@ TEST(AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironmentTest,
EXPECT_CALL(mock_access_token_fetcher, GetAccessTokenFromRefreshToken(_, _))
.Times(0);
- AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(
- kUserNameValue,
- kDeveloperEnvironment);
+ AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(kUserNameValue,
+ kDeveloperEnvironment);
environment_object.SetAccessTokenFetcherForTest(&mock_access_token_fetcher);
@@ -284,13 +279,12 @@ TEST(AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironmentTest,
EXPECT_CALL(mock_access_token_fetcher, GetAccessTokenFromAuthCode(_, _))
.Times(1);
- EXPECT_CALL(mock_access_token_fetcher,
- GetAccessTokenFromRefreshToken(_, _)).Times(1);
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock_access_token_fetcher, GetAccessTokenFromRefreshToken(_, _))
+ .Times(1);
}
- AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(
- kUserNameValue,
- kDeveloperEnvironment);
+ AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(kUserNameValue,
+ kDeveloperEnvironment);
environment_object.SetAccessTokenFetcherForTest(&mock_access_token_fetcher);
@@ -301,10 +295,12 @@ TEST(AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironmentTest,
EXPECT_TRUE(init_result);
EXPECT_TRUE(fake_token_store.refresh_token_write_attempted);
EXPECT_EQ(fake_token_store.refresh_token_value_written.compare(
- kFakeAccessTokenFetcherRefreshTokenValue), 0);
+ kFakeAccessTokenFetcherRefreshTokenValue),
+ 0);
EXPECT_EQ(environment_object.user_name().compare(kUserNameValue), 0);
EXPECT_EQ(environment_object.access_token().compare(
- kFakeAccessTokenFetcherAccessTokenValue), 0);
+ kFakeAccessTokenFetcherAccessTokenValue),
+ 0);
// Attempt to init again, we should not see any additional calls or errors.
bool refresh_result = environment_object.RefreshAccessToken();
@@ -331,13 +327,12 @@ TEST(AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironmentTest, RefreshAccessTokenFailure) {
.Times(1);
// Mock is set up for this call to fail.
- EXPECT_CALL(mock_access_token_fetcher,
- GetAccessTokenFromRefreshToken(_, _)).Times(1);
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock_access_token_fetcher, GetAccessTokenFromRefreshToken(_, _))
+ .Times(1);
}
- AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(
- kUserNameValue,
- kDeveloperEnvironment);
+ AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironment environment_object(kUserNameValue,
+ kDeveloperEnvironment);
environment_object.SetAccessTokenFetcherForTest(&mock_access_token_fetcher);
@@ -348,10 +343,12 @@ TEST(AppRemotingTestDriverEnvironmentTest, RefreshAccessTokenFailure) {
EXPECT_TRUE(init_result);
EXPECT_TRUE(fake_token_store.refresh_token_write_attempted);
EXPECT_EQ(fake_token_store.refresh_token_value_written.compare(
- kFakeAccessTokenFetcherRefreshTokenValue), 0);
+ kFakeAccessTokenFetcherRefreshTokenValue),
+ 0);
EXPECT_EQ(environment_object.user_name().compare(kUserNameValue), 0);
EXPECT_EQ(environment_object.access_token().compare(
- kFakeAccessTokenFetcherAccessTokenValue), 0);
+ kFakeAccessTokenFetcherAccessTokenValue),
+ 0);
fake_access_token_fetcher->set_fail_access_token_from_refresh_token(true);
« no previous file with comments | « remoting/test/app_remoting_test_driver_environment.cc ('k') | remoting/test/fake_access_token_fetcher.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698