Index: Source/core/layout/line/InlineFlowBox.cpp |
diff --git a/Source/core/layout/line/InlineFlowBox.cpp b/Source/core/layout/line/InlineFlowBox.cpp |
index ba754551c4e6e195dbdd2538699d3d728440992d..228cf51f7dd03a9f3a77dc3591a87acf344c07e7 100644 |
--- a/Source/core/layout/line/InlineFlowBox.cpp |
+++ b/Source/core/layout/line/InlineFlowBox.cpp |
@@ -975,6 +975,14 @@ bool InlineFlowBox::nodeAtPoint(const HitTestRequest& request, HitTestResult& re |
if (!locationInContainer.intersects(overflowRect)) |
return false; |
+ if (layoutObject().style()->hasBorderRadius()) { |
+ LayoutRect borderRect = logicalFrameRect(); |
+ borderRect.moveBy(accumulatedOffset); |
+ FloatRoundedRect border = layoutObject().style()->getRoundedBorderFor(borderRect); |
davve
2015/03/24 13:26:03
I don't think this is correct since we'll have a I
Abhijeet Kandalkar Slow
2015/03/24 14:42:44
Above use case is working fine with implementation
davve
2015/03/24 15:49:14
Hm, when I apply your patch to tip-of-tree and run
Abhijeet Kandalkar Slow
2015/03/25 12:43:47
Thanks for inputs. I modified patch to match FF be
|
+ if (!locationInContainer.intersects(border)) |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ |
// Check children first. |
// We need to account for culled inline parents of the hit-tested nodes, so that they may also get included in area-based hit-tests. |
LayoutObject* culledParent = 0; |