Record the time to update top sites through db thread to understand if this is low and how slow it …

components/history/core/browser/top_sites_backend.cc

Index: components/history/core/browser/top_sites_backend.cc
diff --git a/components/history/core/browser/top_sites_backend.cc b/components/history/core/browser/top_sites_backend.cc
index 97fa8487f53441cde2dcc595aca41eefa4f64307..b4b3831eb2a5de735d530424a8a233d7a158fc49 100644
--- a/components/history/core/browser/top_sites_backend.cc
+++ b/components/history/core/browser/top_sites_backend.cc
@@ -9,8 +9,10 @@
 #include "base/files/file_path.h"
 #include "base/location.h"
 #include "base/memory/ref_counted.h"
+#include "base/metrics/histogram_macros.h"
 #include "base/single_thread_task_runner.h"
 #include "base/task/cancelable_task_tracker.h"
+#include "base/trace_event/trace_event.h"
 #include "components/history/core/browser/top_sites_database.h"
 #include "sql/connection.h"
 
@@ -99,9 +101,15 @@ void TopSitesBackend::GetMostVisitedThumbnailsOnDBThread(
 }
 
 void TopSitesBackend::UpdateTopSitesOnDBThread(const TopSitesDelta& delta) {
+  TRACE_EVENT0("startup", "history::TopSitesBackend::UpdateTopSitesOnDBThread");
+
   if (!db_)
     return;
 
+  // TODO(yiyaoliu): Remove the histogram and related code when crbug/223430 is
+  // fixed.
+  base::Time begin_time = base::Time::Now();

[sky, 2015/03/20 14:58:22]

Shouldn't we use timeticks for this sort of stuff?

[yao, 2015/03/20 18:06:01]

Done.

+
   for (size_t i = 0; i < delta.deleted.size(); ++i)
     db_->RemoveURL(delta.deleted[i]);
 
@@ -110,6 +118,9 @@ void TopSitesBackend::UpdateTopSitesOnDBThread(const TopSitesDelta& delta) {
 
   for (size_t i = 0; i < delta.moved.size(); ++i)
     db_->UpdatePageRank(delta.moved[i].url, delta.moved[i].rank);
+
+  UMA_HISTOGRAM_TIMES("History.UpdateTopSitesOnDBThreadTime",
+                      base::Time::Now() - begin_time);
 }
 
 void TopSitesBackend::SetPageThumbnailOnDBThread(const MostVisitedURL& url,