Update from https://crrev.com/320931

base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc

Index: base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc
diff --git a/base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc b/base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc
index c1327318294f8bb5b5a10fbb2ec47b260019b6f8..5d0880c236fc2cc4b80674006c9e8e7027f9540e 100644
--- a/base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc
+++ b/base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc
@@ -148,6 +148,17 @@ class TestTracker : public base::RefCountedThreadSafe<TestTracker> {
         FROM_HERE, reposting_task, SequencedWorkerPool::SKIP_ON_SHUTDOWN);
   }
 
+  // This task reposts itself back onto the SequencedWorkerPool before it
+  // finishes running.
+  void PostRepostingBlockingTask(
+      const scoped_refptr<SequencedWorkerPool>& pool,
+      const SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken& token) {
+    Closure reposting_task =
+        base::Bind(&TestTracker::PostRepostingBlockingTask, this, pool, token);
+    pool->PostSequencedWorkerTaskWithShutdownBehavior(token,
+        FROM_HERE, reposting_task, SequencedWorkerPool::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN);
+  }
+
   // Waits until the given number of tasks have started executing.
   void WaitUntilTasksBlocked(size_t count) {
     {
@@ -795,6 +806,26 @@ TEST_F(SequencedWorkerPoolTest, AvoidsDeadlockOnShutdown) {
   pool()->Shutdown();
 }
 
+// Similar to the test AvoidsDeadlockOnShutdown, but there are now also
+// sequenced, blocking tasks in the queue during shutdown.
+TEST_F(SequencedWorkerPoolTest,
+       AvoidsDeadlockOnShutdownWithSequencedBlockingTasks) {
+  const std::string sequence_token_name("name");
+  for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
+    scoped_refptr<DestructionDeadlockChecker> checker(
+        new DestructionDeadlockChecker(pool()));
+    tracker()->PostRepostingTask(pool(), checker);
+
+    SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken token1 =
+        pool()->GetNamedSequenceToken(sequence_token_name);
+    tracker()->PostRepostingBlockingTask(pool(), token1);
+  }
+
+  // Shutting down the pool should destroy the DestructionDeadlockCheckers,
+  // which in turn should not deadlock in their destructors.
+  pool()->Shutdown();
+}
+
 // Verify that FlushForTesting works as intended.
 TEST_F(SequencedWorkerPoolTest, FlushForTesting) {
   // Should be fine to call on a new instance.