Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(78)

Side by Side Diff: tools/telemetry/telemetry/web_perf/metrics/mainthread_jank_stats_unittest.py

Issue 1007583002: [Telemetry] Remove is_respsonsive flag. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 5 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch
OLDNEW
1 # Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. 1 # Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
2 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be 2 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
3 # found in the LICENSE file. 3 # found in the LICENSE file.
4 4
5 import unittest 5 import unittest
6 6
7 from telemetry.timeline import model as model_module 7 from telemetry.timeline import model as model_module
8 from telemetry.timeline import async_slice 8 from telemetry.timeline import async_slice
9 from telemetry.web_perf import timeline_interaction_record as tir_module 9 from telemetry.web_perf import timeline_interaction_record as tir_module
10 from telemetry.web_perf.metrics import mainthread_jank_stats 10 from telemetry.web_perf.metrics import mainthread_jank_stats
11 11
12 12
13 class MainthreadJankTests(unittest.TestCase): 13 class MainthreadJankTests(unittest.TestCase):
14 14
15 def CreateTestRecord(self, name, start, end, thread_start, thread_end, 15 def CreateTestRecord(self, name, start, end, thread_start, thread_end,
16 parent_thread): 16 parent_thread):
17 s = async_slice.AsyncSlice( 17 s = async_slice.AsyncSlice(
18 'cat', 'Interaction.%s/is_responsive' % name, 18 'cat', 'Interaction.%s' % name,
sullivan 2015/03/16 14:58:30 Do these names get propogated to the dashboard at
eakuefner 2015/03/16 15:20:28 What Ned said is correct -- we actually strip mark
nednguyen 2015/03/16 16:12:17 I don't think we will get rid of all flags. At lea
19 timestamp=start, duration=end - start, start_thread=parent_thread, 19 timestamp=start, duration=end - start, start_thread=parent_thread,
20 end_thread=parent_thread, thread_start=thread_start, 20 end_thread=parent_thread, thread_start=thread_start,
21 thread_duration=thread_end - thread_start) 21 thread_duration=thread_end - thread_start)
22 return tir_module.TimelineInteractionRecord.FromAsyncEvent(s) 22 return tir_module.TimelineInteractionRecord.FromAsyncEvent(s)
23 23
24 def testComputeMainthreadJankStatsForRecord(self): 24 def testComputeMainthreadJankStatsForRecord(self):
25 # The slice hierarchy should look something like this: 25 # The slice hierarchy should look something like this:
26 # [ MessageLoop::RunTask ] [MessageLoop::RunTask][ MessagLoop::RunTask ] 26 # [ MessageLoop::RunTask ] [MessageLoop::RunTask][ MessagLoop::RunTask ]
27 # [ foo ] [ bar ] 27 # [ foo ] [ bar ]
28 # | | 28 # | |
(...skipping 80 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
109 ] 109 ]
110 110
111 stats = mainthread_jank_stats.MainthreadJankStats( 111 stats = mainthread_jank_stats.MainthreadJankStats(
112 renderer_main, test_records) 112 renderer_main, test_records)
113 # Main thread janks covered by records' ranges are: 113 # Main thread janks covered by records' ranges are:
114 # Record 1: (40ms -> 70ms) 114 # Record 1: (40ms -> 70ms)
115 # Record 2: (120ms -> 200ms) 115 # Record 2: (120ms -> 200ms)
116 # Record 3: (220ms -> 400ms), (450ms -> 750ms) 116 # Record 3: (220ms -> 400ms), (450ms -> 750ms)
117 self.assertEquals(560, stats.total_big_jank_thread_time) 117 self.assertEquals(560, stats.total_big_jank_thread_time)
118 self.assertEquals(300, stats.biggest_jank_thread_time) 118 self.assertEquals(300, stats.biggest_jank_thread_time)
OLDNEW

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698