Use DEFINE_TESTCLASS_SHORT macro in tests.

tests/SrcOverTest.cpp

-
 /*
  * Copyright 2011 Google Inc.
  *
  * Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
  * found in the LICENSE file.
  */
+
 #include "Test.h"
+#include "TestClassDef.h"
 #include "SkColorPriv.h"
 #include "SkXfermode.h"
 
 // our std SkAlpha255To256
 static int test_srcover0(unsigned dst, unsigned alpha) {
     return alpha + SkAlphaMul(dst, SkAlpha255To256(255 - alpha));
 }
 
 // faster hack +1
 static int test_srcover1(unsigned dst, unsigned alpha) {
     return alpha + SkAlphaMul(dst, 256 - alpha);
 }
 
 // slower "correct"
 static int test_srcover2(unsigned dst, unsigned alpha) {
     return alpha + SkMulDiv255Round(dst, 255 - alpha);
 }
 
-static void test_srcover_hack(skiatest::Reporter* reporter) {
+DEF_TEST(SrcOver, reporter) {
     /*  Here's the idea. Can we ensure that when we blend on top of an opaque
         dst, that the result always stay's opaque (i.e. exactly 255)?
      */
 
     unsigned i;
     int opaqueCounter0 = 0;
     int opaqueCounter1 = 0;
     int opaqueCounter2 = 0;
     for (i = 0; i <= 255; i++) {
         unsigned result0 = test_srcover0(0xFF, i);
@@ skipping 29 matching lines @@
 #if 0
             // this shows where r1 (faster) differs from r2 (more exact)
             if (r1 != r2) {
                 SkDebugf("--- dst=%d i=%d r1=%d r2=%d exact=%g\n",
                          dst, i, r1, r2, i + dst - dst*i/255.0f);
             }
 #endif
         }
     }
 }
-
-#include "TestClassDef.h"
-DEFINE_TESTCLASS("SrcOver", SrcOverTestClass, test_srcover_hack)