Update language.status and rewrite two tests

Update language.status and rewrite two tests

Added issue numbers

Changed two negative tests into mulit-tests.

R=kustermann@google.com
BUG=

Committed: https://code.google.com/p/dart/source/detail?r=26914

[kustermann, 2013-08-30 11:12:44]

LGTM with comments.

https://codereview.chromium.org/23761003/diff/1/tests/language/constructor9_t...
File tests/language/constructor9_test.dart (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23761003/diff/1/tests/language/constructor9_t...
tests/language/constructor9_test.dart:17: new Klass(5);  /// 01: continued
Why is this continued needed here?

https://codereview.chromium.org/23761003/diff/1/tests/language/constructor_re...
File tests/language/constructor_return_test.dart (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23761003/diff/1/tests/language/constructor_re...
tests/language/constructor_return_test.dart:11: A(this.x) { return; } //
'return;' is equivalent to 'return this;'
If 'return;' is equivalent to 'return this;', what is the difference between
'A()' and 'A.test1()' ?

[Søren Gjesse, 2013-08-30 13:40:01]

Thanks for the review.

https://codereview.chromium.org/23761003/diff/1/tests/language/constructor9_t...
File tests/language/constructor9_test.dart (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23761003/diff/1/tests/language/constructor9_t...
tests/language/constructor9_test.dart:17: new Klass(5);  /// 01: continued
On 2013/08/30 11:12:44, kustermann wrote:
> Why is this continued needed here?

It is not. Removed.

https://codereview.chromium.org/23761003/diff/1/tests/language/constructor_re...
File tests/language/constructor_return_test.dart (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23761003/diff/1/tests/language/constructor_re...
tests/language/constructor_return_test.dart:11: A(this.x) { return; } //
'return;' is equivalent to 'return this;'
On 2013/08/30 11:12:44, kustermann wrote:
> If 'return;' is equivalent to 'return this;', what is the difference between
> 'A()' and 'A.test1()' ?

The comment is bogus, and I have removed it.

The spec says these two things:

It is a compile-time error if a return statement of the form return e; appears
in a generative constructor.

A return statement with no expression, return; is executed by executing the
statement return null;

[Søren Gjesse, 2013-08-30 13:45:01]

Committed patchset #3 manually as r26914 (presubmit successful).