Update language.status

Update language.status

Add some more issue numbers. Rewrite some tests

R=kustermann@google.com
BUG=

Committed: https://code.google.com/p/dart/source/detail?r=27193

[kustermann, 2013-09-05 11:09:51]

Everything looks good except "expect_test.dart"

https://codereview.chromium.org/23621022/diff/1/tests/language/expect_test.dart
File tests/language/expect_test.dart (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23621022/diff/1/tests/language/expect_test.da...
tests/language/expect_test.dart:51: Expect.identical(new C(), ab);
I don't understand your changes in this file.

* The previous behaviour tested the 'identical()' function with Strings [it
seems identical() has special behaviour for Strings (just looked in the spec)].

https://codereview.chromium.org/23621022/diff/1/tests/language/expect_test.da...
tests/language/expect_test.dart:57: throw "Expect.identical did not fail";
These last two statements will always result in an exception, right? Why the
'Expect.equals()' then?

[Søren Gjesse, 2013-09-05 12:23:37]

https://codereview.chromium.org/23621022/diff/1/tests/language/expect_test.dart
File tests/language/expect_test.dart (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23621022/diff/1/tests/language/expect_test.da...
tests/language/expect_test.dart:51: Expect.identical(new C(), ab);
On 2013/09/05 11:09:51, kustermann wrote:
> I don't understand your changes in this file.
> 
> * The previous behaviour tested the 'identical()' function with Strings [it
> seems identical() has special behaviour for Strings (just looked in the
spec)].

Well spotted! I reverted this, and opened a bug instead. Peter and Lasse both
thought that this should only be true for const strings. Checking with Gilad.

The original idea with the change was to have different instances which where
equal and not identical.

https://codereview.chromium.org/23621022/diff/1/tests/language/expect_test.da...
tests/language/expect_test.dart:57: throw "Expect.identical did not fail";
On 2013/09/05 11:09:51, kustermann wrote:
> These last two statements will always result in an exception, right? Why the
> 'Expect.equals()' then?

That was just to keep the same structure in the test.

[kustermann, 2013-09-05 12:25:27]

LGTM

[Søren Gjesse, 2013-09-05 12:37:51]

Committed patchset #2 manually as r27193 (presubmit successful).