Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(14)

Issue 215293002: Use ASSERT instead of CHECK_ISOLATE in cases where we derive the isolate from the native Arguments … (Closed)

Created:
6 years, 9 months ago by siva
Modified:
6 years, 9 months ago
Reviewers:
Ivan Posva
CC:
reviews_dartlang.org, vm-dev_dartlang.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Use ASSERT instead of CHECK_ISOLATE in cases where we derive the isolate from the native Arguments structure. R=iposva@google.com Committed: https://code.google.com/p/dart/source/detail?r=34488

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 3

Patch Set 2 : #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+15 lines, -12 lines) Patch
M runtime/vm/dart_api_impl.cc View 1 10 chunks +15 lines, -12 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4 (0 generated)
siva
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-27 19:49:50 UTC) #1
Ivan Posva
LGTMwC -ip https://codereview.chromium.org/215293002/diff/1/runtime/vm/dart_api_impl.cc File runtime/vm/dart_api_impl.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/215293002/diff/1/runtime/vm/dart_api_impl.cc#newcode3933 runtime/vm/dart_api_impl.cc:3933: ASSERT(isolate != NULL); How about ASSERT(isolate == ...
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-27 21:05:42 UTC) #2
siva
https://codereview.chromium.org/215293002/diff/1/runtime/vm/dart_api_impl.cc File runtime/vm/dart_api_impl.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/215293002/diff/1/runtime/vm/dart_api_impl.cc#newcode3933 runtime/vm/dart_api_impl.cc:3933: ASSERT(isolate != NULL); Good point, I will modify the ...
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-27 21:55:46 UTC) #3
siva
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-27 23:05:59 UTC) #4
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #2 manually as r34488 (presubmit successful).

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698