Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(183)

Issue 194813008: Add compile timestamp to Code (Closed)

Created:
6 years, 9 months ago by Cutch
Modified:
6 years, 9 months ago
Reviewers:
siva
CC:
reviews_dartlang.org, vm-dev_dartlang.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 6
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+11 lines, -0 lines) Patch
M runtime/vm/object.h View 2 chunks +8 lines, -0 lines 4 comments Download
M runtime/vm/object.cc View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 2 comments Download
M runtime/vm/raw_object.h View 1 chunk +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4 (0 generated)
Cutch
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-11 19:34:21 UTC) #1
siva
lgtm https://codereview.chromium.org/194813008/diff/1/runtime/vm/object.cc File runtime/vm/object.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/194813008/diff/1/runtime/vm/object.cc#newcode10248 runtime/vm/object.cc:10248: result.set_comments(Comments::New(0)); Should the timestamp be initialized to 0 ...
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-11 20:32:07 UTC) #2
Cutch
https://codereview.chromium.org/194813008/diff/1/runtime/vm/object.cc File runtime/vm/object.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/194813008/diff/1/runtime/vm/object.cc#newcode10248 runtime/vm/object.cc:10248: result.set_comments(Comments::New(0)); On 2014/03/11 20:32:08, siva wrote: > Should the ...
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-11 21:09:15 UTC) #3
Cutch
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-11 21:14:29 UTC) #4
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #1 manually as r33555 (presubmit successful).

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698