Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(62)

Issue 11045020: Merge BaseGenerator into HtmlDartInterfaceGenerator. (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 2 months ago by podivilov
Modified:
8 years, 2 months ago
Reviewers:
Anton Muhin, podivilov1
CC:
reviews_dartlang.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Merge BaseGenerator into HtmlDartInterfaceGenerator. R=antonm@google.com Committed: https://code.google.com/p/dart/source/detail?r=13180

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+133 lines, -171 lines) Patch
M lib/html/scripts/dartdomgenerator.py View 2 chunks +7 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M lib/html/scripts/dartgenerator.py View 1 chunk +0 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
D lib/html/scripts/systembase.py View 1 chunk +0 lines, -153 lines 0 comments Download
M lib/html/scripts/systemhtml.py View 11 chunks +116 lines, -12 lines 2 comments Download
M lib/html/scripts/systemnative.py View 2 chunks +10 lines, -4 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
podivilov
8 years, 2 months ago (2012-10-03 12:56:01 UTC) #1
Anton Muhin
lgtm https://codereview.chromium.org/11045020/diff/1/lib/html/scripts/systemhtml.py File lib/html/scripts/systemhtml.py (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/11045020/diff/1/lib/html/scripts/systemhtml.py#newcode1094 lib/html/scripts/systemhtml.py:1094: def _DartType(self, type_name): I am slightly uneasy about ...
8 years, 2 months ago (2012-10-03 13:37:49 UTC) #2
podivilov1
8 years, 2 months ago (2012-10-03 15:57:37 UTC) #3
https://codereview.chromium.org/11045020/diff/1/lib/html/scripts/systemhtml.py
File lib/html/scripts/systemhtml.py (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/11045020/diff/1/lib/html/scripts/systemhtml.p...
lib/html/scripts/systemhtml.py:1094: def _DartType(self, type_name):
On 2012/10/03 13:37:49, Anton Muhin wrote:
> I am slightly uneasy about duplication of this code.
> 
> It's definitely small, maybe introduce a function?

I'm somewhat reluctant to accessing private fields of arbitrary objects from a
static function. Maybe leave as is for now?

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698