Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1177)

Unified Diff: base/win/scoped_process_information_unittest.cc

Issue 9700038: ScopedProcessInformation protects against process/thread handle leaks from CreateProcess calls. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Touch a previously missed use of PROCESS_INFORMATION Created 8 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: base/win/scoped_process_information_unittest.cc
diff --git a/base/win/scoped_process_information_unittest.cc b/base/win/scoped_process_information_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..16bfe283a23ce526e30759a4a3374803636a77eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/base/win/scoped_process_information_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include <windows.h>
+
+#include "base/command_line.h"
+#include "base/process_util.h"
+#include "base/test/multiprocess_test.h"
+#include "base/win/scoped_process_information.h"
+#include "testing/multiprocess_func_list.h"
+
+class ScopedProcessInformationTest : public base::MultiProcessTest {
+ protected:
+ void DoCreateProcess(const std::string& main_id,
+ PROCESS_INFORMATION* process_handle);
+};
+
+MULTIPROCESS_TEST_MAIN(ReturnSeven) {
+ return 7;
+}
+
+MULTIPROCESS_TEST_MAIN(ReturnNine) {
+ return 9;
+}
+
+void ScopedProcessInformationTest::DoCreateProcess(
+ const std::string& main_id, PROCESS_INFORMATION* process_handle) {
+ std::wstring cmd_line =
+ this->MakeCmdLine(main_id, false).GetCommandLineString();
+ STARTUPINFO startup_info = {};
+ startup_info.cb = sizeof(startup_info);
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(::CreateProcess(NULL,
+ const_cast<wchar_t*>(cmd_line.c_str()),
+ NULL, NULL, false, 0, NULL, NULL,
+ &startup_info, process_handle));
+}
+
+TEST_F(ScopedProcessInformationTest, TakeProcess) {
+ base::win::ScopedProcessInformation process_info;
+ DoCreateProcess("ReturnSeven", process_info.Receive());
+ int exit_code = 0;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(base::WaitForExitCode(process_info.TakeProcessHandle(),
+ &exit_code));
+ ASSERT_EQ(7, exit_code);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.IsValid());
+ ASSERT_EQ(0u, process_info.process_id());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.process_handle() == NULL);
+ ASSERT_NE(0u, process_info.thread_id());
+ ASSERT_FALSE(process_info.thread_handle() == NULL);
+}
+
+TEST_F(ScopedProcessInformationTest, TakeThread) {
+ base::win::ScopedProcessInformation process_info;
+ DoCreateProcess("ReturnSeven", process_info.Receive());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(::CloseHandle(process_info.TakeThreadHandle()));
+ ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.IsValid());
+ ASSERT_NE(0u, process_info.process_id());
+ ASSERT_FALSE(process_info.process_handle() == NULL);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0u, process_info.thread_id());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.thread_handle() == NULL);
+}
+
+TEST_F(ScopedProcessInformationTest, TakeBoth) {
+ base::win::ScopedProcessInformation process_info;
+ DoCreateProcess("ReturnSeven", process_info.Receive());
+ int exit_code = 0;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(base::WaitForExitCode(process_info.TakeProcessHandle(),
+ &exit_code));
+ ASSERT_EQ(7, exit_code);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(::CloseHandle(process_info.TakeThreadHandle()));
+ ASSERT_FALSE(process_info.IsValid());
+ ASSERT_EQ(0u, process_info.process_id());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.process_handle() == NULL);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0u, process_info.thread_id());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.thread_handle() == NULL);
+}
+
+TEST_F(ScopedProcessInformationTest, TakeNothing) {
+ base::win::ScopedProcessInformation process_info;
+ DoCreateProcess("ReturnSeven", process_info.Receive());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.IsValid());
+ ASSERT_NE(0u, process_info.thread_id());
+ ASSERT_FALSE(process_info.thread_handle() == NULL);
+ ASSERT_NE(0u, process_info.process_id());
+ ASSERT_FALSE(process_info.process_handle() == NULL);
+}
+
+TEST_F(ScopedProcessInformationTest, TakeWholeStruct) {
+ base::win::ScopedProcessInformation process_info;
+ DoCreateProcess("ReturnSeven", process_info.Receive());
+ base::win::ScopedProcessInformation other;
+ *other.Receive() = process_info.Take();
alexeypa (please no reviews) 2012/03/29 04:51:35 Swap could be useful here: process_info.Swap(*othe
erikwright (departed) 2012/03/30 17:30:27 Keeping this as an actual test of Take, but there
+
+ ASSERT_FALSE(process_info.IsValid());
+ ASSERT_EQ(0u, process_info.process_id());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.process_handle() == NULL);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0u, process_info.thread_id());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.thread_handle() == NULL);
+
+ // Validate that what was taken is good.
+ ASSERT_NE(0u, other.thread_id());
+ ASSERT_NE(0u, other.process_id());
+ int exit_code = 0;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(base::WaitForExitCode(other.TakeProcessHandle(),
+ &exit_code));
+ ASSERT_EQ(7, exit_code);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(::CloseHandle(other.TakeThreadHandle()));
+}
+
+TEST_F(ScopedProcessInformationTest, InitiallyInvalid) {
+ base::win::ScopedProcessInformation process_info;
+ ASSERT_FALSE(process_info.IsValid());
+}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698