Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(24)

Unified Diff: tests/untrusted_crash_dump/untrusted_crash_dump.c

Issue 9316125: Adding untrusted crash dump / stack trace tests. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/native_client/trunk/src/native_client
Patch Set: taking out of irt tests Created 8 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: tests/untrusted_crash_dump/untrusted_crash_dump.c
diff --git a/tests/untrusted_crash_dump/untrusted_crash_dump.c b/tests/untrusted_crash_dump/untrusted_crash_dump.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d53e3d4f1ebcf88a169e135842e9cbf861227cc1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/untrusted_crash_dump/untrusted_crash_dump.c
@@ -0,0 +1,284 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2012 The Native Client Authors. All rights reserved.
+ * Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+ * found in the LICENSE file.
+ */
+
+#include <assert.h>
+#include <inttypes.h>
+#include <pthread.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <sys/mman.h>
+#include <sys/nacl_syscalls.h>
+
+#ifdef __GLIBC__
+#include <elf.h>
+#include <link.h>
+#endif /* __GLIBC__ */
+
+#include "native_client/src/untrusted/nacl/syscall_bindings_trampoline.h"
+#include "native_client/tests/untrusted_crash_dump/untrusted_crash_dump.h"
+
+
+#define CRASH_PAGE_CHUNK (64 * 1024)
+#define CRASH_STACK_SIZE (CRASH_PAGE_CHUNK * 4)
+#define CRASH_STACK_GUARD_SIZE CRASH_PAGE_CHUNK
+#define CRASH_STACK_COMPLETE_SIZE (CRASH_STACK_GUARD_SIZE + CRASH_STACK_SIZE)
+
+
+static void (*g_PrevHandler)(int prog_ctr, int stack_ptr) = 0;
+static pthread_key_t g_CrashStackKey;
+static char *g_ProgramName = 0;
+
+
+#ifdef __GLIBC__
+
+struct ProgramTableData {
+ FILE *core;
+ uintptr_t addr;
+ int first;
+};
+
+
+static int PrintSectionsOne(
+ struct dl_phdr_info *info, size_t size, void *data) {
+ int i;
+ struct ProgramTableData *ptd = (struct ProgramTableData*)data;
Mark Seaborn 2012/02/13 19:04:08 Nit: spacing style
bradn 2012/02/13 23:42:03 Done.
+
+ if (ptd->first) {
+ ptd->first = 0;
+ } else {
+ fprintf(ptd->core, ",\n");
+ }
+ fprintf(ptd->core, "{\n");
+ fprintf(ptd->core, "\"dlpi_name\": \"%s\",\n", info->dlpi_name);
+ fprintf(ptd->core, "\"dlpi_addr\": %"PRIuPTR",\n", info->dlpi_addr);
+ fprintf(ptd->core, "\"dlpi_phdr\": [\n");
+ for (i = 0; i < info->dlpi_phnum; i++) {
+ /* Skip non-LOAD type segments. */
+ if (info->dlpi_phdr[i].p_type != PT_LOAD) {
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (i != 0) {
+ fprintf(ptd->core, ",\n");
+ }
+ fprintf(ptd->core, "{\n");
+ fprintf(ptd->core, "\"p_vaddr\": %"PRIuPTR",\n",
+ info->dlpi_phdr[i].p_vaddr);
+ fprintf(ptd->core, "\"p_memsz\": %"PRIuPTR"\n",
+ info->dlpi_phdr[i].p_memsz);
+ fprintf(ptd->core, "}\n");
+ }
+ fprintf(ptd->core, "]\n");
+ fprintf(ptd->core, "}\n");
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void PrintSections(FILE *core) {
Mark Seaborn 2012/02/13 19:04:08 'Sections' -> 'Segments'
bradn 2012/02/13 23:42:03 Done.
+ struct ProgramTableData data;
+ data.core = core;
+ data.first = 1;
+ dl_iterate_phdr(PrintSectionsOne, &data);
+}
+
+static int PrintMappedAddressOne(
Mark Seaborn 2012/02/13 19:04:08 So you have two dl_iterate_phdr() loops. One list
bradn 2012/02/13 23:42:03 I had originally though we might have something in
+ struct dl_phdr_info *info, size_t size, void *data) {
+ int i;
+ struct ProgramTableData *ptd = (struct ProgramTableData *) data;
+ uintptr_t addr = ptd->addr;
+ uintptr_t start;
+ uintptr_t end;
+
+ /* Consider relative to phdr base addr. */
+ addr -= info->dlpi_addr;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < info->dlpi_phnum; i++) {
+ /* Skip non-LOAD type segments. */
+ if (info->dlpi_phdr[i].p_type != PT_LOAD) {
+ continue;
+ }
+ /* See if it's in range for this part. */
+ start = info->dlpi_phdr[i].p_vaddr;
+ end = start + info->dlpi_phdr[i].p_memsz;
+ if (addr >= start && addr < end) {
+ if (info->dlpi_name[0] == '\0') {
+ fprintf(ptd->core, "{\"file\": \"%s\", \"addr\": %"PRIuPTR"}",
+ g_ProgramName, addr);
+ } else {
+ fprintf(ptd->core, "{\"file\": \"%s\", \"addr\": %"PRIuPTR"}",
+ info->dlpi_name, addr);
+ }
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void PrintMappedAddress(FILE *core, uintptr_t addr) {
+ struct ProgramTableData ptd;
+ int result;
+
+ ptd.core = core;
+ ptd.addr = addr;
+ result = dl_iterate_phdr(PrintMappedAddressOne, &ptd);
+ if (result == 0) {
+ fprintf(core, "{\"file\": \"%s\", \"addr\": %"PRIuPTR"}",
+ g_ProgramName, addr);
+ }
+}
+
+#else /* __GLIBC__ */
+
+static void PrintSections(FILE *core) {
+}
+
+static void PrintMappedAddress(FILE *core, uintptr_t addr) {
+ fprintf(core, "{\"file\": \"%s\", \"addr\": %"PRIuPTR"}",
+ g_ProgramName, addr);
+}
+
+#endif /* __GLIBC__ */
+
+uintptr_t SafeRead(uintptr_t a) {
+ /* TODO(bradnelson): make this safer + more architecture general. */
+ /* Only read areas plausibly on the stack. */
+ if (a < 0x30000000 || a > 0x3fffffff) {
Mark Seaborn 2012/02/13 19:04:08 I don't think this is kicking in during your test,
bradn 2012/02/13 23:42:03 Taken out. This raises an interesting question. If
+ return 0;
+ }
+ return *(uintptr_t*)a;
+}
+
+static void StackWalk(FILE *core, uintptr_t ip, uintptr_t fp) {
+ uintptr_t next;
+ uintptr_t i;
+ int first = 1;
+
+ fprintf(core, "\"frames\": [\n");
+ for (;;) {
+ next = SafeRead(fp);
+ if (next <= fp || next == 0) {
+ break;
+ }
+ if (first) {
+ first = 0;
+ } else {
+ fprintf(core, ",");
+ }
+ fprintf(core, "{\n");
+ fprintf(core, "\"fp\": %"PRIuPTR",\n", fp);
+ fprintf(core, "\"ip\": %"PRIuPTR",\n", ip);
+ fprintf(core, "\"ip_mapped\": ");
+ PrintMappedAddress(core, ip);
+ fprintf(core, ",\n");
+ fprintf(core, "\"data\": [\n");
+ for (i = fp + 8; i < next; i += 4) {
+ if (i != fp + 8) {
+ fprintf(core, ",");
+ }
+ fprintf(core, "%"PRIuPTR"\n", SafeRead(i));
+ }
+ fprintf(core, "]\n");
+ fprintf(core, "}\n");
+
+ ip = SafeRead(fp + 4);
+ fp = next;
+ }
+
+ fprintf(core, "]\n");
+}
+
+void CrashHandlerWrapper(int prog_ctr, int stack_ptr);
+asm(".pushsection .text, \"ax\", @progbits\n"
+ ".p2align NACLENTRYALIGN\n"
+ "CrashHandlerWrapper:\n"
+ "popl %eax\n"
+ "pushl %ebp\n"
+ "call CrashHandler\n"
+ ".popsection\n");
+
+void CrashHandler(int frame_ptr, int prog_ctr, int stack_ptr) {
+ FILE *core;
+ const char *core_filename;
+
+ /* Pick core file name. */
+ core_filename = getenv("NACLCOREFILE");
+ if (core_filename == NULL) {
+ core_filename = "naclcore.json";
+ }
+
+ /* Attempt to open core file, otherwise use stdout. */
+ core = fopen(core_filename, "w");
+ if (core == NULL) {
+ core = stdout;
+ }
+
+ fprintf(core, "{\n");
+
+ fprintf(core, "\"sections\": [");
+ PrintSections(core);
+ fprintf(core, "],\n");
+
+ fprintf(core, "\"handler\": {\n");
+ fprintf(core, "\"prog_ctr\": %"PRIuPTR",\n", prog_ctr);
+ fprintf(core, "\"stack_ptr\": %"PRIuPTR",\n", stack_ptr);
+ fprintf(core, "\"frame_ptr\": %"PRIuPTR"\n", frame_ptr);
+ fprintf(core, "},\n");
+
+ StackWalk(core, (uintptr_t) prog_ctr, (uintptr_t) frame_ptr);
+
+ fprintf(core, "}\n");
+
+ if (core != stdout) {
+ fclose(core);
+ }
+
+ exit(166);
+}
+
+void NaClCrashDumpThreadDestructor(void *arg) {
+ munmap(arg, CRASH_STACK_COMPLETE_SIZE);
+}
+
+void NaClCrashDumpInit(char *program_name) {
+ int result;
+ g_ProgramName = program_name;
+ result = pthread_key_create(&g_CrashStackKey, NaClCrashDumpThreadDestructor);
+ assert(result == 0);
+ fprintf(stderr, "ADDR %x\n", (unsigned int)CrashHandlerWrapper);
Mark Seaborn 2012/02/13 19:04:08 Remove debugging code
bradn 2012/02/13 23:42:03 Done.
+ fprintf(stderr, "ADDR %x\n", (unsigned int)CrashHandler);
+ result = NACL_SYSCALL(exception_handler)(CrashHandlerWrapper,
+ &g_PrevHandler);
+ assert(result == 0);
+ NaClCrashDumpInitThread();
+}
+
+void NaClCrashDumpDestroy(void) {
+ int result;
+ result = NACL_SYSCALL(exception_handler)(g_PrevHandler, NULL);
Mark Seaborn 2012/02/13 19:04:08 FWIW, I'm not sure that attempting to restore this
bradn 2012/02/13 23:42:03 Done.
+ assert(result == 0);
+ result = pthread_key_delete(g_CrashStackKey);
+ assert(result == 0);
+ g_ProgramName = 0;
Mark Seaborn 2012/02/13 19:04:08 0 -> NULL
bradn 2012/02/13 23:42:03 Moot, gone.
+}
+
+void NaClCrashDumpInitThread(void) {
+ void *stack;
+ void *guard;
+ int result;
+ /*
+ * NOTE: Setting up a per thread stack is only particularly interesting
+ * for stack overflow.
+ */
+ stack = mmap(NULL, CRASH_STACK_COMPLETE_SIZE,
+ PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
+ MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
+ assert(stack != MAP_FAILED);
+ guard = mmap(stack, CRASH_STACK_GUARD_SIZE,
+ PROT_NONE, MAP_FIXED | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
+ assert(guard != MAP_FAILED);
Mark Seaborn 2012/02/13 19:04:08 A stricter assertion would be assert(guard == st
bradn 2012/02/13 23:42:03 Done.
+ pthread_setspecific(g_CrashStackKey, stack);
+ result = NACL_SYSCALL(exception_stack)(stack, CRASH_STACK_COMPLETE_SIZE);
+ assert(result == 0);
+}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698