Index: chrome/browser/sync/engine/update_applicator.cc |
diff --git a/chrome/browser/sync/engine/update_applicator.cc b/chrome/browser/sync/engine/update_applicator.cc |
index e44083cf69e1a0e3d8b6cfa7584a3948ad6b920a..b124fbef2f987e2f62b2036b8d6f9fcf74d56ac0 100644 |
--- a/chrome/browser/sync/engine/update_applicator.cc |
+++ b/chrome/browser/sync/engine/update_applicator.cc |
@@ -71,14 +71,18 @@ bool UpdateApplicator::AttemptOneApplication( |
progress_ = true; |
application_results_.AddSuccess(entry.Get(syncable::ID)); |
break; |
- case CONFLICT: |
+ case CONFLICT_SIMPLE: |
pointer_++; |
- application_results_.AddConflict(entry.Get(syncable::ID)); |
+ application_results_.AddSimpleConflict(entry.Get(syncable::ID)); |
break; |
case CONFLICT_ENCRYPTION: |
pointer_++; |
application_results_.AddEncryptionConflict(entry.Get(syncable::ID)); |
break; |
+ case CONFLICT_HIERARCHY: |
+ pointer_++; |
+ application_results_.AddHierarchyConflict(entry.Get(syncable::ID)); |
+ break; |
default: |
NOTREACHED(); |
break; |
@@ -133,7 +137,7 @@ UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::ResultTracker(size_t num_results) { |
UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::~ResultTracker() { |
} |
-void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::AddConflict(syncable::Id id) { |
+void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::AddSimpleConflict(syncable::Id id) { |
conflicting_ids_.push_back(id); |
} |
@@ -141,6 +145,10 @@ void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::AddEncryptionConflict(syncable::Id id) { |
encryption_conflict_ids_.push_back(id); |
} |
+void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::AddHierarchyConflict(syncable::Id id) { |
+ hierarchy_conflict_ids_.push_back(id); |
+} |
+ |
void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::AddSuccess(syncable::Id id) { |
successful_ids_.push_back(id); |
} |
@@ -150,19 +158,27 @@ void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::SaveProgress( |
sessions::UpdateProgress* update_progress) { |
vector<syncable::Id>::const_iterator i; |
for (i = conflicting_ids_.begin(); i != conflicting_ids_.end(); ++i) { |
- conflict_progress->AddConflictingItemById(*i); |
- update_progress->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT, *i); |
+ conflict_progress->AddSimpleConflictingItemById(*i); |
+ update_progress->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT_SIMPLE, *i); |
} |
for (i = encryption_conflict_ids_.begin(); |
i != encryption_conflict_ids_.end(); ++i) { |
// Encryption conflicts should not put the syncer into a stuck state. We |
// mark as conflict, so that we reattempt to apply updates, but add it to |
// the list of nonblocking conflicts instead of normal conflicts. |
Nicolas Zea
2012/02/02 21:53:41
blocking -> unresolvable
rlarocque
2012/02/03 22:31:15
"Fixed" by removing these comments. This is not t
|
- conflict_progress->AddNonblockingConflictingItemById(*i); |
- update_progress->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT, *i); |
+ conflict_progress->AddEncryptionConflictingItemById(*i); |
+ update_progress->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT_ENCRYPTION, *i); |
+ } |
+ for (i = hierarchy_conflict_ids_.begin(); |
+ i != hierarchy_conflict_ids_.end(); ++i) { |
+ // There's nothing we can do locally to make progress on these conflicts. |
+ // We add them to the list of non-blocking conflicts, along with the |
Nicolas Zea
2012/02/02 21:53:41
list of unresolvable conflicts
rlarocque
2012/02/03 22:31:15
See above comment.
|
+ // encryption conflicts. |
+ conflict_progress->AddHierarchyConflictingItemById(*i); |
+ update_progress->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT_HIERARCHY, *i); |
} |
for (i = successful_ids_.begin(); i != successful_ids_.end(); ++i) { |
- conflict_progress->EraseConflictingItemById(*i); |
+ conflict_progress->EraseSimpleConflictingItemById(*i); |
update_progress->AddAppliedUpdate(SUCCESS, *i); |
} |
} |
@@ -170,6 +186,7 @@ void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::SaveProgress( |
void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::ClearConflicts() { |
conflicting_ids_.clear(); |
encryption_conflict_ids_.clear(); |
+ hierarchy_conflict_ids_.clear(); |
} |
bool UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::no_conflicts() const { |