Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(303)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/sync/engine/update_applicator.cc

Issue 9305001: sync: Remove the remaining conflict sets code (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: More renames, refactors and fixes Created 8 years, 11 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/browser/sync/engine/update_applicator.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/sync/engine/update_applicator.cc b/chrome/browser/sync/engine/update_applicator.cc
index e44083cf69e1a0e3d8b6cfa7584a3948ad6b920a..727db0bb9f3fc3d7e79b781d360b1510c7e4f0ac 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/sync/engine/update_applicator.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/sync/engine/update_applicator.cc
@@ -71,14 +71,18 @@ bool UpdateApplicator::AttemptOneApplication(
progress_ = true;
application_results_.AddSuccess(entry.Get(syncable::ID));
break;
- case CONFLICT:
+ case CONFLICT_SIMPLE:
pointer_++;
- application_results_.AddConflict(entry.Get(syncable::ID));
+ application_results_.AddSimpleConflict(entry.Get(syncable::ID));
break;
case CONFLICT_ENCRYPTION:
pointer_++;
application_results_.AddEncryptionConflict(entry.Get(syncable::ID));
break;
+ case CONFLICT_HIERARCHY:
+ pointer_++;
+ application_results_.AddHierarchyConflict(entry.Get(syncable::ID));
+ break;
default:
NOTREACHED();
break;
@@ -133,7 +137,7 @@ UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::ResultTracker(size_t num_results) {
UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::~ResultTracker() {
}
-void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::AddConflict(syncable::Id id) {
+void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::AddSimpleConflict(syncable::Id id) {
conflicting_ids_.push_back(id);
}
@@ -141,6 +145,10 @@ void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::AddEncryptionConflict(syncable::Id id) {
encryption_conflict_ids_.push_back(id);
}
+void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::AddHierarchyConflict(syncable::Id id) {
+ hierarchy_conflict_ids_.push_back(id);
+}
+
void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::AddSuccess(syncable::Id id) {
successful_ids_.push_back(id);
}
@@ -150,19 +158,21 @@ void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::SaveProgress(
sessions::UpdateProgress* update_progress) {
vector<syncable::Id>::const_iterator i;
for (i = conflicting_ids_.begin(); i != conflicting_ids_.end(); ++i) {
- conflict_progress->AddConflictingItemById(*i);
- update_progress->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT, *i);
+ conflict_progress->AddSimpleConflictingItemById(*i);
+ update_progress->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT_SIMPLE, *i);
}
for (i = encryption_conflict_ids_.begin();
i != encryption_conflict_ids_.end(); ++i) {
- // Encryption conflicts should not put the syncer into a stuck state. We
- // mark as conflict, so that we reattempt to apply updates, but add it to
- // the list of nonblocking conflicts instead of normal conflicts.
- conflict_progress->AddNonblockingConflictingItemById(*i);
- update_progress->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT, *i);
+ conflict_progress->AddEncryptionConflictingItemById(*i);
+ update_progress->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT_ENCRYPTION, *i);
+ }
+ for (i = hierarchy_conflict_ids_.begin();
+ i != hierarchy_conflict_ids_.end(); ++i) {
+ conflict_progress->AddHierarchyConflictingItemById(*i);
+ update_progress->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT_HIERARCHY, *i);
}
for (i = successful_ids_.begin(); i != successful_ids_.end(); ++i) {
- conflict_progress->EraseConflictingItemById(*i);
+ conflict_progress->EraseSimpleConflictingItemById(*i);
update_progress->AddAppliedUpdate(SUCCESS, *i);
}
}
@@ -170,6 +180,7 @@ void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::SaveProgress(
void UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::ClearConflicts() {
conflicting_ids_.clear();
encryption_conflict_ids_.clear();
+ hierarchy_conflict_ids_.clear();
}
bool UpdateApplicator::ResultTracker::no_conflicts() const {

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698