Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(55)

Issue 9290056: Remove llvm bitcode reader localmod that dropped datalayout. (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 11 months ago by jvoung - send to chromium...
Modified:
8 years, 10 months ago
Reviewers:
pdox, pnacl-team, (google.com) Derek Schuff
CC:
native-client-reviews_googlegroups.com
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Remove llvm bitcode reader localmod that dropped datalayout. As described in bug 2554, this enables a few more "opt" optimizations since "opt" relies on this for the datalayout ("opt" differs from "llc" in that it only uses the target triple for TargetLibraryInfo). Alternatively, we could leave it out of the bitcode and feed the datalayout to opt through a commandline parameter, but we probably want to enforce some consistency w/ Clang -O options (which had already done things assuming the datalayout in the bitcode file), and the commandline option could go out of sync more quickly. related to: BUG= http://code.google.com/p/nativeclient/issues/detail?id=2554

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+1 line, -6 lines) Patch
M llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp View 1 chunk +1 line, -6 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5 (0 generated)
jvoung - send to chromium...
8 years, 11 months ago (2012-01-26 19:48:53 UTC) #1
(google.com) Derek Schuff
lgtm
8 years, 11 months ago (2012-01-26 20:52:59 UTC) #2
jvoung - send to chromium...
We haven't done a toolchain roll in a while so I was tried it out, ...
8 years, 10 months ago (2012-02-01 00:58:04 UTC) #3
robertm
Pdox, this maybe reason for the failed deps roll Robert On 2012/02/01 00:58:04, jvoung wrote: ...
8 years, 10 months ago (2012-02-01 17:25:59 UTC) #4
jvoung - send to chromium...
8 years, 10 months ago (2012-02-03 00:26:00 UTC) #5
Darn I thought I had tested this, but yeah this is definitely tickling the
arm sbtc the wrong way.
I did a gclient sync + toolchain DEPS to exactly this revision and the one
before to check (doesn't work vs works)...
In other news, the toolchain bot does not run any test arm sbtc tests, but
I guess they take a long time.


On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:25 AM, <robertm@google.com> wrote:

> Pdox,
>
> this maybe reason for the failed deps roll
>
> Robert
>
>
> On 2012/02/01 00:58:04, jvoung wrote:
>
>> We haven't done a toolchain roll in a while so I was tried it out, but the
>> pnacl/test.sh test-arm-sbtc keeps failing.
>>
>
>  Will be out tomorrow, but this might be the candidate for reverting.
>>
>
>
>  On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:52 PM, <mailto:dschuff@google.com> wrote:
>>
>
>  > lgtm
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
> http://codereview.chromium.****org/9290056/%3Chttp://coderevi**
> ew.chromium.org/9290056/ <http://codereview.chromium.org/9290056/>>
>
>> >
>>
>
>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Native-Client-Reviews" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>>
>
mailto:native-client-reviews@**googlegroups.com<native-client-reviews@googlegroups.com>
> .
>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>
mailto:native-client-reviews+**unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<native-client-reviews%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>>
http://groups.google.com/**group/native-client-reviews?**hl=en<http://groups....
>> .
>>
>
>
>
>
>
http://codereview.chromium.**org/9290056/<http://codereview.chromium.org/9290...
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Native-Client-Reviews" group.
To post to this group, send email to native-client-reviews@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
native-client-reviews+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/native-client-reviews?hl=en.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698