Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(615)

Side by Side Diff: chrome/installer/gcapi/gcapi_reactivation.cc

Issue 9288056: Implementation of GCAPI reactivation. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Pre-review cleanup Created 8 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch | Annotate | Revision Log
OLDNEW
(Empty)
1 // Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
3 // found in the LICENSE file.
4
5 #include "chrome/installer/gcapi/gcapi_reactivation.h"
6
7 #include "base/time.h"
8 #include "base/win/registry.h"
9 #include "chrome/installer/util/google_update_constants.h"
10
11 using base::Time;
12 using base::win::RegKey;
13
14 namespace {
15 const wchar_t kReactivationHistoryKey[] = L"reactivation";
16
17 std::wstring GetReactivationHistoryKeyPath() {
18 std::wstring reactivation_path(google_update::kRegPathClientState);
19 reactivation_path += L"\\";
20 reactivation_path += google_update::kChromeUpgradeCode;
21 reactivation_path += L"\\";
22 reactivation_path += kReactivationHistoryKey;
23 return reactivation_path;
24 }
25 } // namespace
26
27 bool HasBeenReactivatedByBrandCodes(
28 const std::vector<std::wstring>& brand_codes) {
29 bool success = false;
30
31 RegKey reactivation_key(HKEY_CURRENT_USER,
32 GetReactivationHistoryKeyPath().c_str(),
33 KEY_QUERY_VALUE);
34 if (reactivation_key.Valid()) {
35 std::vector<std::wstring>::const_iterator brand_iter(brand_codes.begin());
36 for (; brand_iter != brand_codes.end(); ++brand_iter) {
37 if (reactivation_key.HasValue(brand_iter->c_str())) {
38 success = true;
Roger Tawa OOO till Jul 10th 2012/01/29 16:32:42 no need for local var if you return true here and
robertshield 2012/01/30 02:40:39 True, but that can cause more code to be generated
39 break;
40 }
41 }
42 }
43
44 return success;
45 }
46
47 bool SetReactivationBrandCode(const std::wstring& brand_code) {
48 bool success = false;
49
50 std::wstring path(google_update::kRegPathClientState);
51 path += L"\\";
52 path += google_update::kChromeUpgradeCode;
53
54 RegKey client_state_key(HKEY_CURRENT_USER, path.c_str(), KEY_SET_VALUE);
55 if (client_state_key.Valid()) {
56 success = client_state_key.WriteValue(
57 google_update::kRegRLZReactivationBrandField,
58 brand_code.c_str()) == ERROR_SUCCESS;
59 }
60
61 if (success) {
62 // Store this brand code in the reactivation history. Store it with a
63 // a currently un-used timestamp for future proofing.
64 RegKey reactivation_key(HKEY_CURRENT_USER,
65 GetReactivationHistoryKeyPath().c_str(),
66 KEY_WRITE);
67 if (reactivation_key.Valid()) {
68 int64 timestamp = Time::Now().ToInternalValue();
69 reactivation_key.WriteValue(brand_code.c_str(),
70 &timestamp,
71 sizeof(timestamp),
72 REG_QWORD);
73 }
74 }
75
76 return success;
77 }
OLDNEW

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698