Chromium Code Reviews| Index: chrome/browser/profiles/profile_impl.cc |
| diff --git a/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_impl.cc b/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_impl.cc |
| index cdef23c94bb42390a98b6e3f6b8d2928c1b787bb..011a514c74caac54467ba49bd055ef7fda41b135 100644 |
| --- a/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_impl.cc |
| +++ b/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_impl.cc |
| @@ -149,6 +149,22 @@ using content::UserMetricsAction; |
| namespace { |
| +// Constrict us to a very specific platform and architecture to make sure |
| +// ifdefs don't cause problems with the check. |
| +#if defined(OS_LINUX) && defined(TOOLKIT_GTK) && defined(ARCH_CPU_X86_64) |
| +// Make sure that the ProfileImpl doesn't grow. We're currently trying to drive |
| +// the number of services that are included in ProfileImpl (instead of using |
| +// ProfileKeyedServiceFactory) to zero. |
| +// |
| +// If you don't know about this effort, please read: |
| +// https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/design-documents/profile-architecture |
| +// |
| +// REVIEWERS: Do not let anyone increment this. We need to drive the number of |
| +// raw accessed services down to zero. DO NOT LET PEOPLE REGRESS THIS UNLESS |
| +// THE PATCH ITSELF IS MAKING PROGRESS ON PKSF REFACTORING. |
| +COMPILE_ASSERT(sizeof(ProfileImpl) == 656u, profile_impl_size_unexpected); |
|
Miranda Callahan
2012/01/06 15:34:57
Should we instead assert sizeof(ProfileImpl) <= 65
Elliot Glaysher
2012/01/06 18:23:58
I'm not crazy about this, but I changed it.
Using
|
| +#endif |
| + |
| // Delay, in milliseconds, before we explicitly create the SessionService. |
| static const int kCreateSessionServiceDelayMS = 500; |