Proper handling of built-in identifiers

tests/language/src/PseudoKWTest.dart

Index: tests/language/src/PseudoKWTest.dart
===================================================================
--- tests/language/src/PseudoKWTest.dart	(revision 3272)
+++ tests/language/src/PseudoKWTest.dart	(working copy)
@@ -49,7 +49,52 @@
   }
 }
 
+typedef(x) => "typedef " + x;
 
+static(abstract) {
+  return abstract == true;
+}
+
+class A {
+  var typedef = 0;
+  set(x) { typedef = x; }
+  get() => typedef - 5;
+
+  static static() {
+    return 1;
+  }
+  static check() {
+    var o = new A();
+    o.set(55);
+    Expect.equals(50, o.get());
+    static();
+  }
+}
+
+class B {
+  var abstract;
+  get get() => abstract;
+  set get(x) => abstract = 2 * x;

[siva, 2012/01/13 18:48:20]

set get(B get) => abstract = 2 * get.get?

[hausner, 2012/01/13 19:22:47]

Nice :) I made it even more pathological and promptly found an case that wasn't
handled correctly (fields definitions of name get, set or operator).

+
+  static() {
+    var o = new B();
+    o.get = 100;
+    Expect.equals(200, o.get);
+  }
+  int operator() {
+    return 1;
+  }
+}
+
+
 main() {
   PseudoKWTest.testMain();
+  A.check();
+  new B().static();
+  Expect.equals(1, new B().operator());
+  Expect.equals(1, A.static());
+  typedef("T");
+  Expect.equals("typedef T", typedef("T"));
+  static("true");
+  Expect.equals(false, static("true"));
 }