Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(230)

Issue 903003: Fix bug in assigned variables analysis.... (Closed)

Created:
10 years, 9 months ago by fschneider
Modified:
9 years, 6 months ago
CC:
v8-dev
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Fix bug in assigned variables analysis. Property stores were not visited correctly by the visitor. I fixed this issue by visiting property stores by visiting receiver and key directly (and not calling visit on the lhs property ast node) Committed: http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=4117

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 2 : '' #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+50 lines, -9 lines) Patch
M src/data-flow.cc View 1 1 chunk +13 lines, -9 lines 0 comments Download
A test/mjsunit/regress/regress-643.js View 1 chunk +37 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
fschneider
10 years, 9 months ago (2010-03-12 12:35:22 UTC) #1
Kevin Millikin (Chromium)
LGTM. http://codereview.chromium.org/903003/diff/1/3 File src/data-flow.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/903003/diff/1/3#newcode1366 src/data-flow.cc:1366: Why so many blank lines in this function?
10 years, 9 months ago (2010-03-12 13:03:38 UTC) #2
fschneider
10 years, 9 months ago (2010-03-12 13:06:32 UTC) #3
http://codereview.chromium.org/903003/diff/1/3
File src/data-flow.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/903003/diff/1/3#newcode1366
src/data-flow.cc:1366: 
On 2010/03/12 13:03:38, Kevin Millikin wrote:
> Why so many blank lines in this function?

Done.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698