Issue 8759005: Mark test mjsunit/debug-step-2 as failing

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Issue 8759005: Mark test mjsunit/debug-step-2 as failing (Closed)

Created:
9 years ago by Søren Gjesse

Modified:
9 years ago

Reviewers:
Rico, danno

CC:
v8-dev

Base URL:
http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/3.6/

Visibility:
Public.

More Reviews

Description

Mark test mjsunit/debug-step-2 as failing This is due to the revert of precise stepping enhancement on this 3.6 branch. R=danno@chromium.org Committed: http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=10119

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : '' #

Created: 9 years ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

		Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Delta from patch set	Stats (+5 lines, -1 line)			Patch
	M	src/version.cc	View	1	1 chunk	+1 line, -1 line	0 comments	Download
	M	test/mjsunit/mjsunit.status	View		1 chunk	+4 lines, -0 lines	0 comments	Download

Messages

Total messages: 5 (0 generated)

Expand Messages | Collapse Messages

Rico

On 2011/12/01 07:32:34, Rico wrote: > LGTM Actually, you should up the version number in ...

9 years ago (2011-12-01 07:49:44 UTC) #3

Rico

On 2011/12/01 07:49:44, Rico wrote: > On 2011/12/01 07:32:34, Rico wrote: > > LGTM > ...

9 years ago (2011-12-01 07:50:21 UTC) #4

Søren Gjesse

9 years ago (2011-12-01 07:58:07 UTC) #5

On 2011/12/01 07:50:21, Rico wrote:
> On 2011/12/01 07:49:44, Rico wrote:
> > On 2011/12/01 07:32:34, Rico wrote:
> > > LGTM
> > 
> > Actually, you should up the version number in version.cc
> An your message clearly states that you don't wan't to

I will bump the version number then.

Expand Messages | Collapse Messages