tools/generate_stubs/generate_stubs_unittest.py - Issue 8678023: Fix python scripts in src/tools/

Side by Side Diff

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Side by Side Diff: tools/generate_stubs/generate_stubs_unittest.py

Issue 8678023: Fix python scripts in src/tools/ (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src

Patch Set: . Created 9 years ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

View unified diff | Download patch | Annotate | Revision Log

OLD	NEW
1 #!/usr/bin/python	1 #!/usr/bin/env python

2 # Copyright (c) 2009 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.	2 # Copyright (c) 2009 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.

3 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be	3 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be

4 # found in the LICENSE file.	4 # found in the LICENSE file.

5	5

6 """Unittest for the generate_stubs.py.	6 """Unittest for the generate_stubs.py.

7	7

8 Since generate_stubs.py is a code generator, it is hard to do a very good	8 Since generate_stubs.py is a code generator, it is hard to do a very good

9 test. Instead of creating a golden-file test, which might be flakey, this	9 test. Instead of creating a golden-file test, which might be flakey, this

10 test elects instead to verify that various components "exist" within the	10 test elects instead to verify that various components "exist" within the

11 generated file as a sanity check. In particular, there is a simple hit	11 generated file as a sanity check. In particular, there is a simple hit

(...skipping 262 matching lines...) Expand 10 before \| Expand all \| Expand 10 after Loading...
274 msg='Expected "%s" in %s' % (decl, contents))	274 msg='Expected "%s" in %s' % (decl, contents))

275 decl = gs.PosixStubWriter.InitializeModuleName(name)	275 decl = gs.PosixStubWriter.InitializeModuleName(name)

276 self.assertTrue(contents.find(decl) != -1,	276 self.assertTrue(contents.find(decl) != -1,

277 msg='Expected "%s" in %s' % (decl, contents))	277 msg='Expected "%s" in %s' % (decl, contents))

278 decl = gs.PosixStubWriter.UninitializeModuleName(name)	278 decl = gs.PosixStubWriter.UninitializeModuleName(name)

279 self.assertTrue(contents.find(decl) != -1,	279 self.assertTrue(contents.find(decl) != -1,

280 msg='Expected "%s" in %s' % (decl, contents))	280 msg='Expected "%s" in %s' % (decl, contents))

281	281

282 if __name__ == '__main__':	282 if __name__ == '__main__':

283 unittest.main()	283 unittest.main()

OLD	NEW