Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(3095)

Issues Search
    My Issues | Starred     Open | Closed | All

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/sync/engine/apply_updates_command_unittest.cc

Issue 8638001: [Sync] Made some sync session member functions const (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Constify a few more, sync to head Created 9 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « chrome/browser/sync/engine/apply_updates_command.cc ('k') | chrome/browser/sync/engine/build_and_process_conflict_sets_command.cc » ('j') | chrome/browser/sync/engine/process_updates_command.cc » ('J')
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: chrome/browser/sync/engine/apply_updates_command_unittest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/sync/engine/apply_updates_command_unittest.cc b/chrome/browser/sync/engine/apply_updates_command_unittest.cc
index a5b9cbf942b85171cfe2cc62104e3535a38607e7..b951e4fd6b3dcb3afb66b92907f3d763c13d482e 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/sync/engine/apply_updates_command_unittest.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/sync/engine/apply_updates_command_unittest.cc
@@ -162,14 +162,16 @@ TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, Simple) {
apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
- sessions::StatusController* status = session()->status_controller();
+ sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_UI);
- EXPECT_EQ(2, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
- EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress().ConflictingItemsSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "Simple update shouldn't result in conflicts";
- EXPECT_EQ(2, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "All items should have been successfully applied";
}
@@ -195,13 +197,15 @@ TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, UpdateWithChildrenBeforeParents) {
apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
- sessions::StatusController* status = session()->status_controller();
+ sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_UI);
- EXPECT_EQ(5, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(5, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
- EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress().ConflictingItemsSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "Simple update shouldn't result in conflicts, even if out-of-order";
- EXPECT_EQ(5, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
+ EXPECT_EQ(5, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "All updates should have been successfully applied";
}
@@ -216,13 +220,15 @@ TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, NestedItemsWithUnknownParent) {
apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
- sessions::StatusController* status = session()->status_controller();
+ sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_UI);
- EXPECT_EQ(2, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
- EXPECT_EQ(2, status->conflict_progress().ConflictingItemsSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "All updates with an unknown ancestors should be in conflict";
- EXPECT_EQ(0, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "No item with an unknown ancestor should be applied";
}
@@ -250,13 +256,15 @@ TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, ItemsBothKnownAndUnknown) {
apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
- sessions::StatusController* status = session()->status_controller();
+ sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_UI);
- EXPECT_EQ(6, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(6, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
- EXPECT_EQ(2, status->conflict_progress().ConflictingItemsSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "The updates with unknown ancestors should be in conflict";
- EXPECT_EQ(4, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
+ EXPECT_EQ(4, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "The updates with known ancestors should be successfully applied";
}
@@ -286,13 +294,15 @@ TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, DecryptablePassword) {
apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
- sessions::StatusController* status = session()->status_controller();
+ sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_PASSWORD);
- EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
- EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress().ConflictingItemsSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "No update should be in conflict because they're all decryptable";
- EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "The updates that can be decrypted should be applied";
}
@@ -312,34 +322,38 @@ TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, UndecryptableData) {
apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
- sessions::StatusController* status = session()->status_controller();
+ sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
EXPECT_TRUE(status->HasConflictingUpdates())
<< "Updates that can't be decrypted should trigger the syncer to have "
<< "conflicting updates.";
{
sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_UI);
- EXPECT_EQ(2, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
- EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress().ConflictingItemsSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "The updates that can't be decrypted should not be in regular "
<< "conflict";
- EXPECT_EQ(2, status->conflict_progress().NonblockingConflictingItemsSize())
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, status->conflict_progress()->NonblockingConflictingItemsSize())
<< "The updates that can't be decrypted should be in nonblocking "
<< "conflict";
- EXPECT_EQ(0, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "No update that can't be decrypted should be applied";
}
{
sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_PASSWORD);
- EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
- EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress().ConflictingItemsSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "The updates that can't be decrypted should not be in regular "
<< "conflict";
- EXPECT_EQ(1, status->conflict_progress().NonblockingConflictingItemsSize())
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, status->conflict_progress()->NonblockingConflictingItemsSize())
<< "The updates that can't be decrypted should be in nonblocking "
<< "conflict";
- EXPECT_EQ(0, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "No update that can't be decrypted should be applied";
}
}
@@ -382,21 +396,23 @@ TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, SomeUndecryptablePassword) {
apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
- sessions::StatusController* status = session()->status_controller();
+ sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
EXPECT_TRUE(status->HasConflictingUpdates())
<< "Updates that can't be decrypted should trigger the syncer to have "
<< "conflicting updates.";
{
sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_PASSWORD);
- EXPECT_EQ(2, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
- EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress().ConflictingItemsSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "The updates that can't be decrypted should not be in regular "
<< "conflict";
- EXPECT_EQ(1, status->conflict_progress().NonblockingConflictingItemsSize())
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, status->conflict_progress()->NonblockingConflictingItemsSize())
<< "The updates that can't be decrypted should be in nonblocking "
<< "conflict";
- EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "The undecryptable password update shouldn't be applied";
}
}
@@ -434,13 +450,15 @@ TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, NigoriUpdate) {
apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
- sessions::StatusController* status = session()->status_controller();
+ sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_PASSIVE);
- EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
- EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress().ConflictingItemsSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "The nigori update shouldn't be in conflict";
- EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "The nigori update should be applied";
EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->is_ready());
@@ -483,13 +501,15 @@ TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, NigoriUpdateForDisabledTypes) {
apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
- sessions::StatusController* status = session()->status_controller();
+ sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_PASSIVE);
- EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
- EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress().ConflictingItemsSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "The nigori update shouldn't be in conflict";
- EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "The nigori update should be applied";
EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->is_ready());
@@ -568,15 +588,17 @@ TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, EncryptUnsyncedChanges) {
apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
- sessions::StatusController* status = session()->status_controller();
+ sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_PASSIVE);
- EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
- EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress().ConflictingItemsSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "No updates should be in conflict";
- EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress().NonblockingConflictingItemsSize())
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->NonblockingConflictingItemsSize())
<< "No updates should be in conflict";
- EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "The nigori update should be applied";
EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->is_ready());
@@ -668,17 +690,19 @@ TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, CannotEncryptUnsyncedChanges) {
apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
- sessions::StatusController* status = session()->status_controller();
+ sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_PASSIVE);
- EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress().AppliedUpdatesSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
<< "All updates should have been attempted";
- EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress().ConflictingItemsSize())
+ ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->ConflictingItemsSize())
<< "The unsynced changes don't trigger a blocking conflict with the "
<< "nigori update.";
- EXPECT_EQ(1, status->conflict_progress().NonblockingConflictingItemsSize())
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, status->conflict_progress()->NonblockingConflictingItemsSize())
<< "The unsynced changes trigger a non-blocking conflict with the "
<< "nigori update.";
- EXPECT_EQ(0, status->update_progress().SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
<< "The nigori update should not be applied";
EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->is_ready());
EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
« no previous file with comments | « chrome/browser/sync/engine/apply_updates_command.cc ('k') | chrome/browser/sync/engine/build_and_process_conflict_sets_command.cc » ('j') | chrome/browser/sync/engine/process_updates_command.cc » ('J')

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698