Updated expectations.

tools/perf_expectations/perf_expectations.json

Index: tools/perf_expectations/perf_expectations.json
===================================================================
--- tools/perf_expectations/perf_expectations.json	(revision 109270)
+++ tools/perf_expectations/perf_expectations.json	(working copy)
@@ -99,11 +99,11 @@
  "xp-release-dual-core/morejs/times/t": {"reva": 105401, "revb": 106573, "improve": 9, "regress": 79, "sha1": "a41f180b"},
  "xp-release-dual-core/moz/times/t": {"reva": 107830, "revb": 109711, "improve": 81, "regress": 176, "sha1": "73d87dab"},
  "xp-release-dual-core/moz/total_byte_b/IO_b": {"reva": 104648, "revb": 105323, "improve": 1159, "regress": 2085, "sha1": "ce5aecd4"},
- "xp-release-dual-core/moz/total_byte_r/IO_r": {"reva": 104947, "revb": 106573, "improve": 474, "regress": 918, "sha1": "965bdf8b"},
+ "xp-release-dual-core/moz/total_byte_r/IO_r": {"reva": 109227, "revb": 109265, "improve": 307, "regress": 473, "sha1": "4654bbef"},

[cmp, 2011/11/09 19:28:37]

for reva, 109227 is okay, 109228 would be better (to line up with the graph)
for revb, 109265 will cause the result at 109266 to be excluded, so it would be
better to use 109266

[ramant (doing other things), 2011/11/09 19:46:09]

http://codereview.chromium.org/8508022/

Done.

  "xp-release-dual-core/moz/total_op_b/IO_op_b": {"reva": 104424, "revb": 104572, "improve": 6497, "regress": 125226, "sha1": "42471143"},
- "xp-release-dual-core/moz/total_op_r/IO_op_r": {"reva": 104935, "revb": 105323, "improve": 2570, "regress": 3924, "sha1": "c0bc8c62"},
+ "xp-release-dual-core/moz/total_op_r/IO_op_r": {"reva": 109227, "revb": 109265, "improve": 1674, "regress": 2364, "sha1": "bd37744c"},

[cmp, 2011/11/09 19:28:37]

same as above

[ramant (doing other things), 2011/11/09 19:46:09]

http://codereview.chromium.org/8508022/

Done.

  "xp-release-dual-core/moz/vm_peak_b/vm_pk_b": {"reva": 102636, "revb": 102660, "improve": 1910579, "regress": 5027636, "sha1": "974f5699"},
- "xp-release-dual-core/moz/vm_peak_r/vm_pk_r": {"reva": 108864, "revb": 109262, "improve": 5498265, "regress": 7840359, "sha1": "230f1c5a"},
+ "xp-release-dual-core/moz/vm_peak_r/vm_pk_r": {"reva": 108861, "revb": 109262, "improve": 5498265, "regress": 7840359, "sha1": "230f1c5a"},

[cmp, 2011/11/09 19:28:37]

sha1 should have been updated, and maybe improve+regress too

after you changed reva on this line, did you definitely run make_expectations.py
again?

[ramant (doing other things), 2011/11/09 19:46:09]

http://codereview.chromium.org/8508022/

Done.

  "xp-release-dual-core/startup/warm/t": {"reva": 76825, "revb": 77094, "improve": -107, "regress": 141, "sha1": "e0dcf672"},
  "xp-release-dual-core/v8_benchmark/score/score": {"reva": 68696, "revb": 69071, "improve": 892, "regress": -668, "sha1": "75a383d3"},
  "xp-release-single-core/dhtml/times/t": {"reva": 98602, "revb": 99994, "improve": -2888, "regress": 3391, "sha1": "30683762"},