Include only policy definitions that apply to the platfrom in the policy definition list.

chrome/browser/policy/configuration_policy_provider_test.cc

Index: chrome/browser/policy/configuration_policy_provider_test.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/policy/configuration_policy_provider_test.cc b/chrome/browser/policy/configuration_policy_provider_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d2b73c4754dd737fb80f6b99ba1c124ee8680a3f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/chrome/browser/policy/configuration_policy_provider_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2011 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "chrome/browser/policy/configuration_policy_provider_test.h"
+
+#include "base/bind.h"
+#include "base/values.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/policy/asynchronous_policy_loader.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/policy/asynchronous_policy_provider.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/policy/configuration_policy_provider.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/policy/policy_map.h"
+#include "policy/policy_constants.h"
+
+namespace policy {
+
+namespace test_policy_definitions {
+
+const char kKeyString[] = "StringPolicy";
+const char kKeyBoolean[] = "BooleanPolicy";
+const char kKeyInteger[] = "IntegerPolicy";
+const char kKeyStringList[] = "StringListPolicy";
+
+// In order to have correct enum values, we alias these to some actual policies.
+extern const ConfigurationPolicyType kPolicyString =

[Joao da Silva, 2011/11/09 15:37:47]

Nit: remove extern here and on the 3 next too

[Mattias Nissler (ping if slow), 2011/11/09 17:04:11]

Done.

+    kPolicyHomepageLocation;
+extern const ConfigurationPolicyType kPolicyBoolean =
+    kPolicyHomepageIsNewTabPage;
+extern const ConfigurationPolicyType kPolicyInteger =
+    kPolicyRestoreOnStartup;
+extern const ConfigurationPolicyType kPolicyStringList =
+    kPolicyRestoreOnStartupURLs;
+
+static const PolicyDefinitionList::Entry kEntries[] = {

[Joao da Silva, 2011/11/09 15:37:47]

Nit: not sure if we prefer an anonymous namespace instead of static. It's up to
you :-)

[Mattias Nissler (ping if slow), 2011/11/09 17:04:11]

I think the additional noise generated by the anonymous namespace is detrimental
if we're talking about just a single declaration.

+  { kPolicyString, base::Value::TYPE_STRING, kKeyString },
+  { kPolicyBoolean, base::Value::TYPE_BOOLEAN, kKeyBoolean },
+  { kPolicyInteger, base::Value::TYPE_INTEGER, kKeyInteger },
+  { kPolicyStringList, base::Value::TYPE_LIST, kKeyStringList },
+};
+
+const PolicyDefinitionList kList = {
+  kEntries, kEntries + arraysize(kEntries)
+};
+
+}  // namespace test_policy_definitions
+
+PolicyProviderTestHarness::PolicyProviderTestHarness() {}
+
+PolicyProviderTestHarness::~PolicyProviderTestHarness() {}
+
+ConfigurationPolicyProviderTest::ConfigurationPolicyProviderTest()
+  : ui_thread_(content::BrowserThread::UI, &loop_),
+    file_thread_(content::BrowserThread::FILE, &loop_) {}
+
+ConfigurationPolicyProviderTest::~ConfigurationPolicyProviderTest() {}
+
+void ConfigurationPolicyProviderTest::SetUp() {
+  test_harness_.reset((*GetParam())());
+  test_harness_->SetUp();
+
+  provider_.reset(
+      test_harness_->CreateProvider(&test_policy_definitions::kList));
+
+  PolicyMap policy_map;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(provider_->Provide(&policy_map));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(policy_map.empty());
+}
+
+void ConfigurationPolicyProviderTest::TearDown() {
+  // Give providers the chance to clean up after themselves on the file thread.
+  provider_.reset();
+  loop_.RunAllPending();
+}
+
+void ConfigurationPolicyProviderTest::CheckValue(
+    const char* policy_name,
+    ConfigurationPolicyType policy_type,
+    const base::Value& expected_value,
+    base::Closure install_value) {
+  // Install the value, reload policy and check the provider for the value.
+  install_value.Run();
+  provider_->ForceReload();
+  loop_.RunAllPending();
+  PolicyMap policy_map;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(provider_->Provide(&policy_map));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1U, policy_map.size());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(base::Value::Equals(&expected_value,
+                                  policy_map.Get(policy_type)));
+}
+
+TEST_P(ConfigurationPolicyProviderTest, Empty) {
+  provider_->ForceReload();
+  loop_.RunAllPending();
+  PolicyMap policy_map;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(provider_->Provide(&policy_map));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(policy_map.empty());
+}
+
+TEST_P(ConfigurationPolicyProviderTest, StringValue) {
+  const char kTestString[] = "string_value";
+  StringValue expected_value(kTestString);
+  CheckValue(test_policy_definitions::kKeyString,
+             test_policy_definitions::kPolicyString,
+             expected_value,
+             base::Bind(&PolicyProviderTestHarness::InstallStringPolicy,
+                        base::Unretained(test_harness_.get()),
+                        test_policy_definitions::kKeyString,
+                        kTestString));
+}
+
+TEST_P(ConfigurationPolicyProviderTest, BooleanValue) {
+  base::FundamentalValue expected_value(true);
+  CheckValue(test_policy_definitions::kKeyBoolean,
+             test_policy_definitions::kPolicyBoolean,
+             expected_value,
+             base::Bind(&PolicyProviderTestHarness::InstallBooleanPolicy,
+                        base::Unretained(test_harness_.get()),
+                        test_policy_definitions::kKeyBoolean,
+                        true));
+}
+
+TEST_P(ConfigurationPolicyProviderTest, IntegerValue) {
+  base::FundamentalValue expected_value(42);
+  CheckValue(test_policy_definitions::kKeyInteger,
+             test_policy_definitions::kPolicyInteger,
+             expected_value,
+             base::Bind(&PolicyProviderTestHarness::InstallIntegerPolicy,
+                        base::Unretained(test_harness_.get()),
+                        test_policy_definitions::kKeyInteger,
+                        42));
+}
+
+TEST_P(ConfigurationPolicyProviderTest, StringListValue) {
+  base::ListValue expected_value;
+  expected_value.Set(0U, base::Value::CreateStringValue("first"));
+  expected_value.Set(1U, base::Value::CreateStringValue("second"));
+  CheckValue(test_policy_definitions::kKeyStringList,
+             test_policy_definitions::kPolicyStringList,
+             expected_value,
+             base::Bind(&PolicyProviderTestHarness::InstallStringListPolicy,
+                        base::Unretained(test_harness_.get()),
+                        test_policy_definitions::kKeyStringList,
+                        &expected_value));
+}
+
+}  // namespace policy