Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(253)

Unified Diff: content/common/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc

Issue 8416019: Add a sequenced worker pool (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src/
Patch Set: '' Created 9 years, 2 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/common/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc
===================================================================
--- content/common/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc (revision 0)
+++ content/common/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2011 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "base/bind.h"
+#include "base/memory/ref_counted.h"
+#include "base/synchronization/lock.h"
+#include "base/synchronization/waitable_event.h"
+#include "base/threading/platform_thread.h"
+#include "content/common/sequenced_worker_pool.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+// IMPORTANT NOTE:
+//
+// Many of these tests have failure modes where they'll hang forever. These
+// tests should not be flaky, and hangling indicates a type of failure. Do not
+// mark as flaky if they're hanging, it's likely an actual bug.
+
+namespace {
+
+const size_t kNumWorkerThreads = 3;
+
+class TestTracker : public base::RefCountedThreadSafe<TestTracker> {
+ public:
+ TestTracker() : completed_event_(false, false) {
+ }
+
+ // Each of these tasks appends the argument to the complete sequence vector
+ // so calling code can see what order they finished in.
+ void FastTask(int id) {
+ SignalWorkerDone(id);
+ }
+ void SlowTask(int id) {
+ base::PlatformThread::Sleep(1000);
+ SignalWorkerDone(id);
+ }
+ void BlockOnEventTask(int id, base::WaitableEvent* event) {
+ event->Wait();
+ SignalWorkerDone(id);
+ }
+
+ // Blocks the current thread until at least the given number of tasks are in
+ // the completed vector, and then returns a copy.
+ std::vector<int> WaitUntilTasksComplete(size_t num_tasks) {
+ for (;;) {
+ {
+ base::AutoLock lock(lock_);
+ if (complete_sequence_.size() >= num_tasks)
+ return complete_sequence_;
+ }
+ completed_event_.Wait();
+ }
+ }
+
+ private:
+ void SignalWorkerDone(int id) {
+ base::AutoLock lock(lock_);
+ complete_sequence_.push_back(id);
+ completed_event_.Signal();
+ }
+
+ // Protects the complete_sequence.
+ base::Lock lock_;
+
+ // Signaled every time something is posted to the complete_sequence_.
+ base::WaitableEvent completed_event_;
+
+ // Protected by lock_.
+ std::vector<int> complete_sequence_;
+};
+
+class SequencedWorkerPoolTest : public testing::Test,
+ public SequencedWorkerPool::TestingObserver {
+ public:
+ SequencedWorkerPoolTest()
+ : pool_(kNumWorkerThreads),
+ tracker_(new TestTracker) {
+ pool_.SetTestingObserver(this);
+ }
+ ~SequencedWorkerPoolTest() {
+ }
+
+ virtual void SetUp() {
+ }
+ virtual void TearDown() {
+ }
+
+ SequencedWorkerPool& pool() { return pool_; }
+ TestTracker* tracker() { return tracker_.get(); }
+
+ protected:
+ // This closure will be executed right before the pool blocks on shutdown.
+ base::Closure before_wait_for_shutdown_;
+
+ private:
+ // SequencedWorkerPool::TestingObserver implementation.
+ virtual void WillWaitForShutdown() {
+ if (!before_wait_for_shutdown_.is_null())
+ before_wait_for_shutdown_.Run();
+ }
+
+ SequencedWorkerPool pool_;
+ scoped_refptr<TestTracker> tracker_;
+};
+
+// Checks that the given number of entries are in the tasks to complete of
+// the given tracker, and then signals the given event the given number of
+// times. This is used to wakt up blocked background threads before blocking
+// on shutdown.
+void EnsureTasksToCompleteCountAndSignal(TestTracker* tracker,
+ size_t expected_tasks_to_complete,
+ base::WaitableEvent* event,
+ size_t times_to_signal_event) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(
+ expected_tasks_to_complete,
+ tracker->WaitUntilTasksComplete(expected_tasks_to_complete).size());
+
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < times_to_signal_event; i++)
+ event->Signal();
+}
+
+} // namespace
+
+// Tests that posting a bunch of tasks (many more than the number of worker
+// threads) runs them all.
+TEST_F(SequencedWorkerPoolTest, LotsOfTasks) {
+ pool().PostWorkerTask(SequencedWorkerPool::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN, FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&TestTracker::SlowTask, tracker(), 0));
+
+ const size_t kNumTasks = 17;
+ for (size_t i = 1; i < kNumTasks; i++) {
+ pool().PostWorkerTask(SequencedWorkerPool::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN, FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&TestTracker::FastTask, tracker(), i));
+ }
+
+ std::vector<int> result = tracker()->WaitUntilTasksComplete(kNumTasks);
+ EXPECT_EQ(kNumTasks, result.size());
+}
+
+// Test that tasks with the same sequence token are executed in order but don't
+// affect other tasks.
+TEST_F(SequencedWorkerPoolTest, Sequence) {
+ // Fill all the worker threads except one.
+ base::WaitableEvent background_event(false, false);
+ const size_t kNumBackgroundTasks = kNumWorkerThreads - 1;
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < kNumBackgroundTasks; i++) {
+ pool().PostWorkerTask(SequencedWorkerPool::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN, FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&TestTracker::BlockOnEventTask,
+ tracker(), i, &background_event));
+ }
+
+ // Create two tasks with the same sequence token, one that will block on the
+ // event, and one which will just complete quickly when it's run. Since there
+ // is one worker thread free, the first task will start and then block, and
+ // the second task should be waiting.
+ base::WaitableEvent event1(false, false);
+ SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken token1 = pool().GetSequenceToken();
+ pool().PostSequencedWorkerTask(
+ token1, SequencedWorkerPool::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN, FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&TestTracker::BlockOnEventTask, tracker(), 100,
+ &event1));
+ pool().PostSequencedWorkerTask(
+ token1, SequencedWorkerPool::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN, FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&TestTracker::FastTask, tracker(), 101));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0u, tracker()->WaitUntilTasksComplete(0).size());
+
+ // Create another two tasks as above with a different token. These will be
+ // blocked since there are no slots to run.
+ SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken token2 = pool().GetSequenceToken();
+ pool().PostSequencedWorkerTask(
+ token2, SequencedWorkerPool::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN, FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&TestTracker::FastTask, tracker(), 200));
+ pool().PostSequencedWorkerTask(
+ token2, SequencedWorkerPool::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN, FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&TestTracker::FastTask, tracker(), 201));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0u, tracker()->WaitUntilTasksComplete(0).size());
+
+ // Let one background task complete. This should then let both tasks of
+ // token2 run to completion in order. The second task of token1 should still
+ // be blocked.
+ background_event.Signal();
+ std::vector<int> result = tracker()->WaitUntilTasksComplete(3);
+ ASSERT_EQ(3u, result.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(200, result[1]);
+ EXPECT_EQ(201, result[2]);
+
+ // Finish the rest of the background tasks. This should leave some workers
+ // free with the second token1 task still blocked on the first.
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < kNumBackgroundTasks - 1; i++)
+ background_event.Signal();
+ EXPECT_EQ(kNumBackgroundTasks + 2,
+ tracker()->WaitUntilTasksComplete(kNumBackgroundTasks + 2).size());
+
+ // Allow the first task of token1 to complete. This should run the second.
+ event1.Signal();
+ result = tracker()->WaitUntilTasksComplete(kNumBackgroundTasks + 4);
+ ASSERT_EQ(kNumBackgroundTasks + 4, result.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(100, result[result.size() - 2]);
+ EXPECT_EQ(101, result[result.size() - 1]);
+}
+
+// Tests that unrun tasks are discarded properly according to their shutdown
+// mode.
+TEST_F(SequencedWorkerPoolTest, DiscardOnShutdown) {
+ // Start tasks to take all the threads and block them.
+ base::WaitableEvent background_event(false, false);
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < kNumWorkerThreads; i++) {
+ pool().PostWorkerTask(SequencedWorkerPool::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN, FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&TestTracker::BlockOnEventTask,
+ tracker(), i, &background_event));
+ }
+
+ // Create some tasks with different shutdown modes.
+ pool().PostWorkerTask(SequencedWorkerPool::CONTINUE_ON_SHUTDOWN, FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&TestTracker::FastTask, tracker(), 100));
+ pool().PostWorkerTask(SequencedWorkerPool::SKIP_ON_SHUTDOWN, FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&TestTracker::FastTask, tracker(), 101));
+ pool().PostWorkerTask(SequencedWorkerPool::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN, FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&TestTracker::FastTask, tracker(), 102));
+
+ // Shutdown the woeker pool. This should discard all non-blocking tasks.
+ before_wait_for_shutdown_ =
+ base::Bind(&EnsureTasksToCompleteCountAndSignal, tracker(), 0,
+ &background_event, kNumWorkerThreads);
+ pool().Shutdown();
+
+ std::vector<int> result = tracker()->WaitUntilTasksComplete(4);
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, result.size());
+
+ // The last item should be the BLOCK_SHUTDOWN task, the other two should have
+ // been dropped.
+ EXPECT_EQ(102, result[3]);
+}
+
+// Tests that CONTINUE_ON_SHUTDOWN tasks don't block shutdown.
+TEST_F(SequencedWorkerPoolTest, ContinueOnShutdown) {
+ base::WaitableEvent background_event(false, false);
+ pool().PostWorkerTask(SequencedWorkerPool::CONTINUE_ON_SHUTDOWN, FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&TestTracker::BlockOnEventTask,
+ tracker(), 0, &background_event));
+
+ // This should not block. If this test hangs, it means it failed.
+ pool().Shutdown();
+
+ // The task should not have completed yet.
+ EXPECT_EQ(0u, tracker()->WaitUntilTasksComplete(0).size());
+
+ // Posting more tasks should fail.
+ EXPECT_FALSE(pool().PostWorkerTask(SequencedWorkerPool::CONTINUE_ON_SHUTDOWN,
+ FROM_HERE, base::Bind(&TestTracker::FastTask, tracker(), 0)));
+
+ // Continue the background thread and make sure the task can complete.
+ background_event.Signal();
+ std::vector<int> result = tracker()->WaitUntilTasksComplete(1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, result.size());
+}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698