Implement Harmony sets and maps.

test/mjsunit/harmony/collections.js

Index: test/mjsunit/harmony/collections.js
diff --git a/test/mjsunit/harmony/collections.js b/test/mjsunit/harmony/collections.js
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1ad1c6f349749e4a674e250b0fbc531b760cc24e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/mjsunit/harmony/collections.js
@@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
+// Copyright 2011 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+//       notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+//       copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
+//       disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
+//       with the distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+//       contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
+//       from this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+// Flags: --harmony-collections --expose-gc
+
+
+// Test valid getter and setter calls on Sets.
+function TestValidSetCalls(m) {
+  assertDoesNotThrow(function () { m.add(new Object) });
+  assertDoesNotThrow(function () { m.has(new Object) });
+  assertDoesNotThrow(function () { m.delete(new Object) });
+}
+TestValidSetCalls(new Set);
+
+
+// Test valid getter and setter calls on Maps and WeakMaps
+function TestValidMapCalls(m) {
+  assertDoesNotThrow(function () { m.get(new Object) });
+  assertDoesNotThrow(function () { m.set(new Object) });
+  assertDoesNotThrow(function () { m.has(new Object) });
+  assertDoesNotThrow(function () { m.delete(new Object) });
+}
+TestValidMapCalls(new Map);
+TestValidMapCalls(new WeakMap);
+
+
+// Test invalid getter and setter calls for WeakMap only
+function TestInvalidCalls(m) {
+  assertThrows(function () { m.get(undefined) }, TypeError);
+  assertThrows(function () { m.set(undefined, 0) }, TypeError);
+  assertThrows(function () { m.get(0) }, TypeError);
+  assertThrows(function () { m.set(0, 0) }, TypeError);
+  assertThrows(function () { m.get('a-key') }, TypeError);
+  assertThrows(function () { m.set('a-key', 0) }, TypeError);
+}
+TestInvalidCalls(new WeakMap);
+
+
+// Test expected behavior for Sets
+function TestSet(set, key) {
+  assertFalse(set.has(key));
+  set.add(key);
+  assertTrue(set.has(key));
+  set.delete(key);
+  assertFalse(set.has(key));
+}
+function TestSetBehavior(set) {
+  for (i = 0; i < 20; i++) {

[arv (Not doing code reviews), 2011/10/26 17:09:44]

missing var

[Michael Starzinger, 2011/10/27 15:36:05]

Done (will include in next CL).

+    TestSet(set, new Object);
+  }
+}
+TestSet(new Set, 23);
+TestSet(new Set, 'foo');
+TestSetBehavior(new Set);
+
+
+// Test expected mapping behavior for Maps and WeakMaps
+function TestMapping(map, key, value) {
+  map.set(key, value);
+  assertSame(value, map.get(key));
+}
+function TestMapBehavior1(m) {
+  TestMapping(m, new Object, 23);
+  TestMapping(m, new Object, 'the-value');
+  TestMapping(m, new Object, new Object);
+}
+TestMapBehavior1(new Map);
+TestMapBehavior1(new WeakMap);
+
+
+// Test expected mapping behavior for Maps only
+function TestMapBehavior2(m) {
+  for (var i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
+    TestMapping(m, i, new Object);
+    TestMapping(m, i / 10, new Object);
+    TestMapping(m, 'key-' + i, new Object);
+  }
+  var keys = [ +0, -0, +Infinity, -Infinity, true, false ];

[arv (Not doing code reviews), 2011/10/26 17:09:44]

is it worth testing NaN, undefined and null too?

[Michael Starzinger, 2011/10/27 15:36:05]

Currently "undefined" and "null" cannot be used as keys to Maps, I am working on
that. The test for correct "NaN" handling is further down at line 203.

+  for (var i = 0; i < keys.length; i++) {
+    TestMapping(m, keys[i], new Object);
+  }
+}
+TestMapBehavior2(new Map);
+
+
+// Test expected querying behavior of Maps and WeakMaps
+function TestQuery(m) {
+  var key = new Object;
+  TestMapping(m, key, 'to-be-present');
+  assertTrue(m.has(key));
+  assertFalse(m.has(new Object));
+  TestMapping(m, key, undefined);
+  assertFalse(m.has(key));
+  assertFalse(m.has(new Object));
+}
+TestQuery(new Map);
+TestQuery(new WeakMap);
+
+
+// Test expected deletion behavior of Maps and WeakMaps
+function TestDelete(m) {
+  var key = new Object;
+  TestMapping(m, key, 'to-be-deleted');
+  assertTrue(m.delete(key));
+  assertFalse(m.delete(key));
+  assertFalse(m.delete(new Object));
+  assertSame(m.get(key), undefined);
+}
+TestDelete(new Map);
+TestDelete(new WeakMap);
+
+
+// Test GC of Maps and WeakMaps with entry
+function TestGC1(m) {
+  var key = new Object;
+  m.set(key, 'not-collected');
+  gc();
+  assertSame('not-collected', m.get(key));
+}
+TestGC1(new Map);
+TestGC1(new WeakMap);
+
+
+// Test GC of Maps and WeakMaps with chained entries
+function TestGC2(m) {
+  var head = new Object;
+  for (key = head, i = 0; i < 10; i++, key = m.get(key)) {
+    m.set(key, new Object);
+  }
+  gc();
+  var count = 0;
+  for (key = head; key != undefined; key = m.get(key)) {
+    count++;
+  }
+  assertEquals(11, count);
+}
+TestGC2(new Map);
+TestGC2(new WeakMap);
+
+
+// Test property attribute [[Enumerable]]
+function TestEnumerable(func) {
+  function props(x) {
+    var array = [];
+    for (var p in x) array.push(p);
+    return array.sort();
+  }
+  assertArrayEquals([], props(func));
+  assertArrayEquals([], props(func.prototype));
+  assertArrayEquals([], props(new func()));
+}
+TestEnumerable(Set);
+TestEnumerable(Map);
+TestEnumerable(WeakMap);
+
+
+// Test arbitrary properties on Maps and WeakMaps
+function TestArbitrary(m) {
+  function TestProperty(map, property, value) {
+    map[property] = value;
+    assertEquals(value, map[property]);
+  }
+  for (i = 0; i < 20; i++) {

[arv (Not doing code reviews), 2011/10/26 17:09:44]

var

[Michael Starzinger, 2011/10/27 15:36:05]

Done (will include in next CL).

+    TestProperty(m, i, 'val' + i);
+    TestProperty(m, 'foo' + i, 'bar' + i);
+  }
+  TestMapping(m, new Object, 'foobar');
+}
+TestArbitrary(new Map);
+TestArbitrary(new WeakMap);
+
+
+// Test direct constructor call
+assertTrue(Set() instanceof Set);
+assertTrue(Map() instanceof Map);
+assertTrue(WeakMap() instanceof WeakMap);
+
+
+// Test whether NaN values as keys are treated correctly.
+var s = new Set;
+assertFalse(s.has(NaN));
+assertFalse(s.has(NaN + 1));
+assertFalse(s.has(23));
+s.add(NaN);
+assertTrue(s.has(NaN));
+assertTrue(s.has(NaN + 1));
+assertFalse(s.has(23));
+var m = new Map;
+assertFalse(m.has(NaN));
+assertFalse(m.has(NaN + 1));
+assertFalse(m.has(23));
+m.set(NaN, 'a-value');
+assertTrue(m.has(NaN));
+assertTrue(m.has(NaN + 1));
+assertFalse(m.has(23));
+
+
+// Test some common JavaScript idioms for Sets
+var s = new Set;
+assertTrue(s instanceof Set);
+assertTrue(Set.prototype.add instanceof Function)
+assertTrue(Set.prototype.has instanceof Function)
+assertTrue(Set.prototype.delete instanceof Function)
+
+
+// Test some common JavaScript idioms for Maps
+var m = new Map;
+assertTrue(m instanceof Map);
+assertTrue(Map.prototype.set instanceof Function)
+assertTrue(Map.prototype.get instanceof Function)
+assertTrue(Map.prototype.has instanceof Function)
+assertTrue(Map.prototype.delete instanceof Function)
+
+
+// Test some common JavaScript idioms for WeakMaps
+var m = new WeakMap;
+assertTrue(m instanceof WeakMap);
+assertTrue(WeakMap.prototype.set instanceof Function)
+assertTrue(WeakMap.prototype.get instanceof Function)
+assertTrue(WeakMap.prototype.has instanceof Function)
+assertTrue(WeakMap.prototype.delete instanceof Function)
+
+
+// Regression test for WeakMap prototype.
+assertTrue(WeakMap.prototype.constructor === WeakMap)
+assertTrue(Object.getPrototypeOf(WeakMap.prototype) === Object.prototype)
+
+
+// Regression test for issue 1617: The prototype of the WeakMap constructor
+// needs to be unique (i.e. different from the one of the Object constructor).
+assertFalse(WeakMap.prototype === Object.prototype);
+var o = Object.create({});
+assertFalse("get" in o);
+assertFalse("set" in o);
+assertEquals(undefined, o.get);
+assertEquals(undefined, o.set);
+var o = Object.create({}, { myValue: {
+  value: 10,
+  enumerable: false,
+  configurable: true,
+  writable: true
+}});
+assertEquals(10, o.myValue);
+
+
+// Stress Test
+// There is a proposed stress-test available at the es-discuss mailing list
+// which cannot be reasonably automated.  Check it out by hand if you like:
+// https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2011-May/014096.html