Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(38)

Issue 8363012: Check for XInput2 for touchui and aura bots. (Closed)

Created:
9 years, 2 months ago by sadrul
Modified:
9 years, 2 months ago
CC:
chromium-reviews, pam+watch_chromium.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Check for XInput2 for touchui and aura bots. BUG=101061 TEST=none Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=106652

Patch Set 1 : . #

Total comments: 3

Patch Set 2 : . #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+37 lines, -5 lines) Patch
M tools/xdisplaycheck/xdisplaycheck.cc View 1 3 chunks +37 lines, -5 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 8 (0 generated)
sadrul
I took the liberty of changing from printf to fprintf(stderr
9 years, 2 months ago (2011-10-20 20:49:58 UTC) #1
Emmanuel Saint-loubert-Bié
lgtm
9 years, 2 months ago (2011-10-20 20:54:17 UTC) #2
Peter Mayo
http://codereview.chromium.org/8363012/diff/2001/tools/xdisplaycheck/xdisplaycheck.cc File tools/xdisplaycheck/xdisplaycheck.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/8363012/diff/2001/tools/xdisplaycheck/xdisplaycheck.cc#newcode17 tools/xdisplaycheck/xdisplaycheck.cc:17: #include <X11/extensions/XInput2.h> Does this not want to be wrapped ...
9 years, 2 months ago (2011-10-20 20:58:28 UTC) #3
tony
lgtm http://codereview.chromium.org/8363012/diff/2001/tools/xdisplaycheck/xdisplaycheck.cc File tools/xdisplaycheck/xdisplaycheck.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/8363012/diff/2001/tools/xdisplaycheck/xdisplaycheck.cc#newcode17 tools/xdisplaycheck/xdisplaycheck.cc:17: #include <X11/extensions/XInput2.h> On 2011/10/20 20:58:28, Peter Mayo wrote: ...
9 years, 2 months ago (2011-10-20 21:19:49 UTC) #4
sadrul
http://codereview.chromium.org/8363012/diff/2001/tools/xdisplaycheck/xdisplaycheck.cc File tools/xdisplaycheck/xdisplaycheck.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/8363012/diff/2001/tools/xdisplaycheck/xdisplaycheck.cc#newcode17 tools/xdisplaycheck/xdisplaycheck.cc:17: #include <X11/extensions/XInput2.h> On 2011/10/20 21:19:49, tony wrote: > On ...
9 years, 2 months ago (2011-10-20 21:42:38 UTC) #5
Peter Mayo
lgtm
9 years, 2 months ago (2011-10-20 21:58:30 UTC) #6
sadrul
Is it safe to just go ahead and land this, or do I need to ...
9 years, 2 months ago (2011-10-20 22:05:27 UTC) #7
Peter Mayo (wrong one)
9 years, 2 months ago (2011-10-20 22:08:12 UTC) #8
I believe it is as safe as any other change that is common to an entire
platform.

If it breaks ... much will go red and it will get reverted.

Have you tested?  tried on linux and linux_touch and linux_aura?


(I am just about to fix the linux_aura :  it might be interesting to look at
the unfixed result)


On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:05 PM, <sadrul@chromium.org> wrote:

> Is it safe to just go ahead and land this, or do I need to coordinate with
> the
> troopers?
>
>
http://codereview.chromium.**org/8363012/<http://codereview.chromium.org/8363...
>



-- 

Peter Mayo | Tangent | petermayo@google.com | 519-880-3439

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698