| Index: chrome/browser/sync/glue/typed_url_change_processor.cc
|
| ===================================================================
|
| --- chrome/browser/sync/glue/typed_url_change_processor.cc (revision 105162)
|
| +++ chrome/browser/sync/glue/typed_url_change_processor.cc (working copy)
|
| @@ -170,8 +170,8 @@
|
| bool TypedUrlChangeProcessor::ShouldSyncVisit(
|
| history::URLVisitedDetails* details) {
|
| int typed_count = details->row.typed_count();
|
| - PageTransition::Type transition = static_cast<PageTransition::Type>(
|
| - details->transition & PageTransition::CORE_MASK);
|
| + content::PageTransition transition = static_cast<content::PageTransition>(
|
| + details->transition & content::PAGE_TRANSITION_CORE_MASK);
|
|
|
| // Just use an ad-hoc criteria to determine whether to ignore this
|
| // notification. For most users, the distribution of visits is roughly a bell
|
| @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
|
| // suggestions. But there are relatively few URLs with > 10 visits, and those
|
| // tend to be more broadly distributed such that there's no need to sync up
|
| // every visit to preserve their relative ordering.
|
| - return (transition == PageTransition::TYPED &&
|
| + return (transition == content::PAGE_TRANSITION_TYPED &&
|
| (typed_count < kTypedUrlVisitThrottleThreshold ||
|
| (typed_count % kTypedUrlVisitThrottleMultiple) == 0));
|
| }
|
| @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@
|
| DCHECK(c == 0 || typed_url.visits(c) > typed_url.visits(c - 1));
|
| added_visits.push_back(history::VisitInfo(
|
| base::Time::FromInternalValue(typed_url.visits(c)),
|
| - typed_url.visit_transitions(c)));
|
| + content::PageTransitionFromInt(typed_url.visit_transitions(c))));
|
| }
|
|
|
| pending_new_visits_.push_back(
|
|
|