| Index: test/mjsunit/const-redecl.js
|
| ===================================================================
|
| --- test/mjsunit/const-redecl.js (revision 9531)
|
| +++ test/mjsunit/const-redecl.js (working copy)
|
| @@ -98,7 +98,8 @@
|
| var msg = s;
|
| if (opt_e) { e = opt_e; msg += "; " + opt_e; }
|
| assertEquals(expected, TestLocal(s,e), "local:'" + msg + "'");
|
| - assertEquals(expected, TestGlobal(s,e), "global:'" + msg + "'");
|
| + // Redeclarations of global consts do not throw, they are silently ignored.
|
| + assertEquals(42, TestGlobal(s, 42), "global:'" + msg + "'");
|
| assertEquals(expected, TestContext(s,e), "context:'" + msg + "'");
|
| }
|
|
|
| @@ -218,3 +219,62 @@
|
| // Test that const inside with behaves correctly.
|
| TestAll(87, "with ({x:42}) { const x = 87; }", "x");
|
| TestAll(undefined, "with ({x:42}) { const x; }", "x");
|
| +
|
| +
|
| +// Additional tests for how various combinations of re-declarations affect
|
| +// the values of the var/const in question.
|
| +try {
|
| + eval("var undefined;");
|
| +} catch (ex) {
|
| + assertUnreachable("undefined (1) has thrown");
|
| +}
|
| +
|
| +var original_undef = undefined;
|
| +var undefined = 1; // Should be silently ignored.
|
| +assertEquals(original_undef, undefined, "undefined got overwritten");
|
| +undefined = original_undef;
|
| +
|
| +var a; const a; const a = 1;
|
| +assertEquals(1, a, "a has wrong value");
|
| +a = 2;
|
| +assertEquals(2, a, "a should be writable");
|
| +
|
| +var b = 1; const b = 2;
|
| +assertEquals(2, b, "b has wrong value");
|
| +
|
| +var c = 1; const c = 2; const c = 3;
|
| +assertEquals(3, c, "c has wrong value");
|
| +
|
| +const d = 1; const d = 2;
|
| +assertEquals(1, d, "d has wrong value");
|
| +
|
| +const e = 1; var e = 2;
|
| +assertEquals(1, e, "e has wrong value");
|
| +
|
| +const f = 1; const f;
|
| +assertEquals(1, f, "f has wrong value");
|
| +
|
| +var g; const g = 1;
|
| +assertEquals(1, g, "g has wrong value");
|
| +g = 2;
|
| +assertEquals(2, g, "g should be writable");
|
| +
|
| +const h; var h = 1;
|
| +assertEquals(undefined,h, "h has wrong value");
|
| +
|
| +eval("Object.defineProperty(this, 'i', { writable: true });"
|
| + + "const i = 7;"
|
| + + "assertEquals(7, i, \"i has wrong value\");");
|
| +
|
| +var global = this;
|
| +assertThrows(function() {
|
| + Object.defineProperty(global, 'j', { writable: true })
|
| +}, TypeError);
|
| +const j = 2; // This is what makes the function above throw, because the
|
| +// const declaration gets hoisted and makes the property non-configurable.
|
| +assertEquals(2, j, "j has wrong value");
|
| +
|
| +var k = 1; const k;
|
| +// You could argue about the expected result here. For now, the winning
|
| +// argument is that "const k;" is equivalent to "const k = undefined;".
|
| +assertEquals(undefined, k, "k has wrong value");
|
|
|