third_party/lcov-1.9/LICENSE - Issue 7926007: Adding the third-party tool: lcov-v1.9

Side by Side Diff

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Side by Side Diff: third_party/lcov-1.9/LICENSE

Issue 7926007: Adding the third-party tool: lcov-v1.9 (Closed) Base URL: http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/

Patch Set: Created 9 years, 3 months ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

View unified diff | Download patch | Annotate | Revision Log

OLD	NEW
(Empty)
	1 Pulled from usr/bin/lcov
	Mark Mentovai 2011/09/19 19:20:18 What’s this mean? Whose /usr/bin/lcov? Where? Why? What’s this mean? Whose /usr/bin/lcov? Where? Why? Is the license really nowhere in the lcov source tree? It seems to exist in the COPYING file, rendering this file an unnecessary confusing distraction. philmarti 2011/09/22 10:15:09 This file is a requirement for third-party tools. Show quoted text On 2011/09/19 19:20:18, Mark Mentovai wrote: > What’s this mean? Whose /usr/bin/lcov? Where? Why? Is the license really nowhere > in the lcov source tree? It seems to exist in the COPYING file, rendering this > file an unnecessary confusing distraction. This file is a requirement for third-party tools. There is no slash in front of usr/bin/lcov. Maybe I should have said ./usr/bin/lcov or third_party/lcov-1.9/usr/bin/lcov ? Let me know what you prefer and if it helps making more sense. Sorry for being ambiguous. Mark Mentovai 2011/09/22 13:54:05 philmarti wrote: philmarti wrote: Show quoted text > On 2011/09/19 19:20:18, Mark Mentovai wrote: > > What’s this mean? Whose /usr/bin/lcov? Where? Why? Is the license really > nowhere > > in the lcov source tree? It seems to exist in the COPYING file, rendering this > > file an unnecessary confusing distraction. > > This file is a requirement for third-party tools. > There is no slash in front of usr/bin/lcov. Maybe I should have said > ./usr/bin/lcov or third_party/lcov-1.9/usr/bin/lcov ? Let me know what you > prefer and if it helps making more sense. Sorry for being ambiguous. It would be bin/lcov, or better as third_party/lcov-1.9/bin/lcov, but you’re going to remove this LICENSE file anyway so it’s not necessary.
	2

	3 # Copyright (c) International Business Machines Corp., 2002,2010

	4 #

	5 # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify

	6 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by

	7 # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at

	8 # your option) any later version.

	9 #

	10 # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but

	11 # WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of

	12 # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU

	13 # General Public License for more details.

	14 #

	15 # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License

	16 # along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software

	17 # Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA

	18

OLD	NEW

« no previous file with comments | « third_party/lcov-1.9/COPYING ('k') | third_party/lcov-1.9/Makefile » ('j') | third_party/lcov-1.9/README.chromium » ('J')