Chromium Code Reviews| Index: src/scopes.h |
| diff --git a/src/scopes.h b/src/scopes.h |
| index 2917a63bba553a3a141acae6875ab83279c0f176..214db1bc0f7adc6dcd323497acb076f6c5367c62 100644 |
| --- a/src/scopes.h |
| +++ b/src/scopes.h |
| @@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ class Scope: public ZoneObject { |
| FUNCTION_SCOPE, // The top-level scope for a function. |
| GLOBAL_SCOPE, // The top-level scope for a program or a top-level eval. |
| CATCH_SCOPE, // The scope introduced by catch. |
| - BLOCK_SCOPE // The scope introduced by a new block. |
| + BLOCK_SCOPE, // The scope introduced by a new block. |
| + WITH_SCOPE // The scope introduced by with. |
| }; |
| Scope(Scope* outer_scope, Type type); |
| @@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ class Scope: public ZoneObject { |
| // The scope name is only used for printing/debugging. |
| void SetScopeName(Handle<String> scope_name) { scope_name_ = scope_name; } |
| - void Initialize(bool inside_with); |
| + void Initialize(); |
| // Checks if the block scope is redundant, i.e. it does not contain any |
| // block scoped declarations. In that case it is removed from the scope |
| @@ -149,7 +150,6 @@ class Scope: public ZoneObject { |
| // Create a new unresolved variable. |
| VariableProxy* NewUnresolved(Handle<String> name, |
| - bool inside_with, |
| int position = RelocInfo::kNoPosition); |
| // Remove a unresolved variable. During parsing, an unresolved variable |
| @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ class Scope: public ZoneObject { |
| void RecordWithStatement() { scope_contains_with_ = true; } |
| // Inform the scope that the corresponding code contains an eval call. |
| - void RecordEvalCall() { scope_calls_eval_ = true; } |
| + void RecordEvalCall() { if (!is_global_scope()) scope_calls_eval_ = true; } |
| // Enable strict mode for the scope (unless disabled by a global flag). |
| void EnableStrictMode() { |
| @@ -215,6 +215,10 @@ class Scope: public ZoneObject { |
| bool is_global_scope() const { return type_ == GLOBAL_SCOPE; } |
| bool is_catch_scope() const { return type_ == CATCH_SCOPE; } |
| bool is_block_scope() const { return type_ == BLOCK_SCOPE; } |
| + bool is_with_scope() const { return type_ == WITH_SCOPE; } |
| + bool is_declaration_scope() const { |
| + return is_eval_scope() || is_function_scope() || is_global_scope(); |
| + } |
| bool is_strict_mode() const { return strict_mode_; } |
| bool is_strict_mode_eval_scope() const { |
| return is_eval_scope() && is_strict_mode(); |
| @@ -222,7 +226,9 @@ class Scope: public ZoneObject { |
| // Information about which scopes calls eval. |
| bool calls_eval() const { return scope_calls_eval_; } |
| - bool outer_scope_calls_eval() const { return outer_scope_calls_eval_; } |
| + bool calls_non_strict_eval() { |
| + return scope_calls_eval_ && !is_strict_mode(); |
| + } |
| bool outer_scope_calls_non_strict_eval() const { |
| return outer_scope_calls_non_strict_eval_; |
| } |
| @@ -383,10 +389,8 @@ class Scope: public ZoneObject { |
| bool strict_mode_; |
| // Computed via PropagateScopeInfo. |
| - bool outer_scope_calls_eval_; |
| bool outer_scope_calls_non_strict_eval_; |
| bool inner_scope_calls_eval_; |
| - bool outer_scope_is_eval_scope_; |
| bool force_eager_compilation_; |
| // True if it doesn't need scope resolution (e.g., if the scope was |
| @@ -396,7 +400,7 @@ class Scope: public ZoneObject { |
| // Computed as variables are declared. |
| int num_var_or_const_; |
| - // Computed via AllocateVariables; function scopes only. |
| + // Computed via AllocateVariables; function, block and catch scopes only. |
| int num_stack_slots_; |
| int num_heap_slots_; |
| @@ -409,9 +413,58 @@ class Scope: public ZoneObject { |
| Variable* NonLocal(Handle<String> name, Variable::Mode mode); |
| // Variable resolution. |
| - Variable* LookupRecursive(Handle<String> name, |
| - bool from_inner_function, |
| - Variable** invalidated_local); |
| + // Possible results of a recursive variable lookup. |
| + enum LookupResult { |
|
Kevin Millikin (Chromium)
2011/09/16 12:58:19
This sounds like a silly request, but: we already
Steven
2011/09/16 18:29:52
Used BindingKind for lack of a better name.
On 201
|
| + // The variable reference could be statically resolved to a variable |
| + // binding which is return in the output parameter *var. There is no |
| + // 'with' statement between the reference and the binding and no scope |
| + // between the reference scope (inclusive) and binding scope (exclusive) |
| + // makes a non-strict 'eval' call. |
| + BOUND, |
| + |
| + // The variable reference could be statically resolved to a variable |
| + // binding which is return in the output parameter *var. There is no |
| + // 'with' statement between the reference and the binding, but some scope |
| + // between the reference scope (inclusive) and binding scope (exclusive) |
| + // makes a non-strict 'eval' call, that might possibly introduce variable |
| + // bindings shadowing the found one. Thus the found variable binding is |
| + // just a guess. |
| + BOUND_EVAL_SHADOWED, |
| + |
| + // The variable reference could not be statically resolved to any binding |
| + // and thus should be considered referencing a global variable. No variable |
| + // binding is returned in the output parameter *var. The variable reference |
| + // is not inside any 'with' statement and no scope between the reference |
| + // scope (inclusive) and global scope (exclusive) makes a non-strict 'eval' |
| + // call. |
| + UNBOUND, |
| + |
| + // The variable reference could not be statically resolved to any binding. |
| + // No variable binding is returned in the output parameter *var. The |
| + // variable reference is not inside any 'with' statement, but some scope |
| + // between the reference scope (inclusive) and global scope (exclusive) |
| + // makes a non-strict 'eval' call, that might possibly introduce a variable |
| + // binding. Thus the reference should be considered referencing a global |
| + // variable unless it is shadowed by an 'eval' introduced binding. |
| + UNBOUND_EVAL_SHADOWED, |
| + |
| + // The variable could not be statically resolved and needs to be looked up |
| + // dynamically. There are two possible reasons: |
| + // * A 'with' statement has been encountered and there is no variable |
| + // binding for the name between the variable reference and the 'with'. |
| + // The variable potentially references a property of the 'with' object. |
| + // * The code is being executed as part of a call to 'eval' and the calling |
| + // context chain contains either a variable binding for the name or it |
| + // contains a 'with' context. |
| + DYNAMIC_LOOKUP |
| + }; |
| + |
| + // Lookup a variable reference given by name recursively starting with this |
| + // scope. If the code is executed because of a call to 'eval', the context |
| + // parameter should be set to the calling context of 'eval'. |
| + LookupResult LookupRecursive(Handle<String> name, |
| + Handle<Context> context, |
| + Variable** var); |
| void ResolveVariable(Scope* global_scope, |
| Handle<Context> context, |
| VariableProxy* proxy); |
| @@ -419,9 +472,7 @@ class Scope: public ZoneObject { |
| Handle<Context> context); |
| // Scope analysis. |
| - bool PropagateScopeInfo(bool outer_scope_calls_eval, |
| - bool outer_scope_calls_non_strict_eval, |
| - bool outer_scope_is_eval_scope); |
| + bool PropagateScopeInfo(bool outer_scope_calls_non_strict_eval); |
| bool HasTrivialContext() const; |
| // Predicates. |
| @@ -438,7 +489,7 @@ class Scope: public ZoneObject { |
| void AllocateVariablesRecursively(); |
| private: |
| - // Construct a function or block scope based on the scope info. |
| + // Construct a scope based on the scope info. |
| Scope(Scope* inner_scope, Type type, Handle<SerializedScopeInfo> scope_info); |
| // Construct a catch scope with a binding for the name. |