Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(48)

Issue 7834028: Pulling back revision 6635 and 6634 due to broken builds. (Closed)

Created:
9 years, 3 months ago by sanga
Modified:
9 years, 3 months ago
CC:
native-client-reviews_googlegroups.com
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Pulling back revision 6635 and 6634 due to broken builds. TBR Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/native_client?view=rev&revision=6636

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+50 lines, -122 lines) Patch
M tests/spec2k/emit_perf_log.sh View 1 chunk +5 lines, -5 lines 0 comments Download
M tools/browser_tester/browser_tester.py View 1 chunk +0 lines, -4 lines 0 comments Download
M tools/browser_tester/browsertester/browserlauncher.py View 4 chunks +45 lines, -28 lines 0 comments Download
D tools/browser_tester/browsertester/browserprocess.py View 1 chunk +0 lines, -85 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5 (0 generated)
sanga
9 years, 3 months ago (2011-09-05 22:17:31 UTC) #1
pdox
sanga, Do you have evidence that the failures were more than flakes?
9 years, 3 months ago (2011-09-06 06:38:24 UTC) #2
Evgeniy Stepanov
On 2011/09/06 06:38:24, pdox wrote: > sanga, > > Do you have evidence that the ...
9 years, 3 months ago (2011-09-06 07:32:30 UTC) #3
pdox
sanga, it is counter-productive to revert commits due to flakes. Jan's change can only affect ...
9 years, 3 months ago (2011-09-06 07:42:52 UTC) #4
Sang Ahn
9 years, 3 months ago (2011-09-06 15:40:44 UTC) #5
It'd be helpful if the committer waited until the build finished, and
notified the sheriff they think the failure is due to flakiness.

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:42 AM, <pdox@google.com> wrote:

> sanga,
>
> it is counter-productive to revert commits due to flakes. Jan's change can
> only
> affect the Spec2K bots, which are green. The bots that failed on eugenis'
> change
> went green the next build. Also, none of the failures appear to be related
> to
> the change, but they fit the pattern of common flakes.
>
> In the future, please try to rule out a flake before you revert. In this
> case,
> you could have triggered a rebuild to see if the same bots failed.
>
>
>
>
http://codereview.chromium.**org/7834028/<http://codereview.chromium.org/7834...
>



-- 
Sang Wook Ahn

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Native-Client-Reviews" group.
To post to this group, send email to native-client-reviews@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
native-client-reviews+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/native-client-reviews?hl=en.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698