Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(118)

Side by Side Diff: build/protoc.gypi

Issue 7621073: Unify gyp rules for running protoc. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: fix Created 9 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch | Annotate | Revision Log
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | remoting/proto/chromotocol.gyp » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Toggle Intra-line Diffs ('i') | Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
OLDNEW
(Empty)
1 # Copyright (c) 2011 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
2 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
3 # found in the LICENSE file.
4
5 # This file is meant to be included into an target to provide a rule
6 # to invoke protoc in a consistent manner.
7 #
8 # To use this, create a gyp target with the following form:
9 # {
10 # 'target_name': 'my_proto_lib',
11 # 'sources': [
12 # 'foo.proto',
13 # 'bar.proto',
14 # ],
15 # 'variables': {
16 # 'proto_in_dir': '.'
17 # 'proto_out_dir': 'dir/for/my_proto_lib'
18 # },
19 # 'includes': ['path/to/this/gypi/file'],
20 # }
21 # If necessary, you may add normal .cc files to the sources list or other gyp
22 # dependencies. The proto headers are guaranteed to be generated before any
23 # source files, even within this target, are compiled.
24 #
25 # The 'proto_in_dir' variable must be the relative path to the
26 # directory containing the .proto files.
27 #
28 # The 'proto_out_dir' variable specifies the path suffix that output
29 # files are generated under. Targets that gyp-depend on my_proto_lib
30 # will be able to include the resulting proto headers with an include
31 # like:
32 # #include "dir/for/my_proto_lib/foo.pb.h"
33 #
34 # Implementation notes:
35 # A proto_out_dir of foo/bar produces
36 # <(SHARED_INTERMEDIATE_DIR)/protoc_out/foo/bar/{file1,file2}.pb.{cc,h}
37 # <(SHARED_INTERMEDIATE_DIR)/pyproto/foo/bar/{file1,file2}_pb2.py
38
39 {
40 'variables': {
41 'protoc': '<(PRODUCT_DIR)/<(EXECUTABLE_PREFIX)protoc<(EXECUTABLE_SUFFIX)',
42 'cc_dir': '<(SHARED_INTERMEDIATE_DIR)/protoc_out/<(proto_out_dir)',
43 'py_dir': '<(PRODUCT_DIR)/pyproto/<(proto_out_dir)',
TVL 2011/08/18 20:56:50 'proto_in_dir?': '.' if it's common?
Evan Martin 2011/08/18 21:12:43 Did you mean %? The only use of '?' I could find
TVL 2011/08/19 13:18:27 Yes, sorry.
44 },
45 'rules': [
46 {
47 'rule_name': 'genproto',
48 'extension': 'proto',
49 'inputs': [
50 '<(protoc)',
51 ],
52 'outputs': [
53 '<(py_dir)/<(RULE_INPUT_ROOT)_pb2.py',
54 '<(cc_dir)/<(RULE_INPUT_ROOT).pb.cc',
55 '<(cc_dir)/<(RULE_INPUT_ROOT).pb.h',
56 ],
57 'action': [
58 '<(protoc)',
59 '--proto_path=<(proto_in_dir)',
60 # Naively you'd use <(RULE_INPUT_PATH) here, but protoc requires
61 # --proto_path is a strict prefix of the path given as an argument.
62 '<(proto_in_dir)/<(RULE_INPUT_ROOT)<(RULE_INPUT_EXT)',
63 '--cpp_out=<(cc_dir)',
64 '--python_out=<(py_dir)',
65 ],
66 'message': 'Generating C++ and Python code from <(RULE_INPUT_PATH)',
67 'process_outputs_as_sources': 1,
68 },
69 ],
70 'dependencies': [
71 '<(DEPTH)/third_party/protobuf/protobuf.gyp:protoc#host',
72 '<(DEPTH)/third_party/protobuf/protobuf.gyp:protobuf_lite',
73 ],
74 'include_dirs': [
75 '<(SHARED_INTERMEDIATE_DIR)/protoc_out',
76 ],
77 'direct_dependent_settings': {
78 'include_dirs': [
79 '<(SHARED_INTERMEDIATE_DIR)/protoc_out',
80 ]
81 },
82 # This target exports a hard dependency because it generates header
83 # files.
84 'hard_dependency': 1,
85 }
OLDNEW
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | remoting/proto/chromotocol.gyp » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698