Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(384)

Issue 7605024: views: Force child views to paint into their own texture when the parent has an external texture. (Closed)

Created:
9 years, 4 months ago by sadrul
Modified:
9 years, 4 months ago
CC:
chromium-reviews, dhollowa
Visibility:
Public.

Description

views: Force child views to paint into their own texture when the parent has an external texture. BUG=none TEST=none Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=96177

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+10 lines, -5 lines) Patch
M views/view.cc View 3 chunks +10 lines, -5 lines 2 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 6 (0 generated)
sadrul
I believe this is the fix we agreed on? I haven't been able to test ...
9 years, 4 months ago (2011-08-10 05:31:04 UTC) #1
jonathan.backer
On 2011/08/10 05:31:04, sadrul wrote: > I believe this is the fix we agreed on? ...
9 years, 4 months ago (2011-08-10 14:24:22 UTC) #2
jonathan.backer
9 years, 4 months ago (2011-08-10 14:24:34 UTC) #3
rjkroege
LGTM http://codereview.chromium.org/7605024/diff/1/views/view.cc File views/view.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/7605024/diff/1/views/view.cc#newcode1237 views/view.cc:1237: (*i)->SetPaintToLayer(true); this is not recursive right? It's only ...
9 years, 4 months ago (2011-08-10 14:29:53 UTC) #4
jonathan.backer
> views/view.cc:1237: (*i)->SetPaintToLayer(true); > this is not recursive right? It's only the immediate children? Yes.
9 years, 4 months ago (2011-08-10 14:30:46 UTC) #5
sadrul
9 years, 4 months ago (2011-08-10 14:33:05 UTC) #6
http://codereview.chromium.org/7605024/diff/1/views/view.cc
File views/view.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/7605024/diff/1/views/view.cc#newcode1237
views/view.cc:1237: (*i)->SetPaintToLayer(true);
On 2011/08/10 14:29:53, rjkroege wrote:
> this is not recursive right? It's only the immediate children?

Yes, that is correct (i.e. not recursive).

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698