Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(5084)

Unified Diff: base/observer_list_threadsafe.h

Issue 7584016: Use MessageLoopProxy instead of MessageLoop to dispatch notifications in ObserverListThreadsafe. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Store MessageLoopProxies in ObserversListMap Created 9 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | base/observer_list_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: base/observer_list_threadsafe.h
diff --git a/base/observer_list_threadsafe.h b/base/observer_list_threadsafe.h
index f4ff68d7c942513dddcb79f2c26bd90549eeab5e..eb3ed19575f5f028483cd9c4e91e5343171bb242 100644
--- a/base/observer_list_threadsafe.h
+++ b/base/observer_list_threadsafe.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include "base/logging.h"
#include "base/memory/ref_counted.h"
#include "base/message_loop.h"
+#include "base/message_loop_proxy.h"
#include "base/observer_list.h"
#include "base/task.h"
@@ -86,7 +87,7 @@ class ObserverListThreadSafe
// Add an observer to the list. An observer should not be added to
// the same list more than once.
void AddObserver(ObserverType* obs) {
- ObserverList<ObserverType>* list = NULL;
+ ObserverListContext* context = NULL;
MessageLoop* loop = MessageLoop::current();
// TODO(mbelshe): Get rid of this check. Its needed right now because
// Time currently triggers usage of the ObserverList.
@@ -95,11 +96,16 @@ class ObserverListThreadSafe
return; // Some unittests may access this without a message loop.
{
base::AutoLock lock(list_lock_);
- if (observer_lists_.find(loop) == observer_lists_.end())
- observer_lists_[loop] = new ObserverList<ObserverType>(type_);
- list = observer_lists_[loop];
+ typename ObserversListMap::iterator it = observer_lists_.find(loop);
darin (slow to review) 2011/08/08 19:33:21 nit: maybe it is not worth it, but you could just
adamk 2011/08/08 19:50:04 I've made the code do this. Certainly not a big d
+ if (it == observer_lists_.end()) {
+ std::pair<typename ObserversListMap::iterator, bool> result =
+ observer_lists_.insert(
+ std::make_pair(loop, new ObserverListContext));
+ it = result.first;
+ }
+ context = it->second;
}
- list->AddObserver(obs);
+ context->list().AddObserver(obs);
}
// Remove an observer from the list if it is in the list.
@@ -108,7 +114,7 @@ class ObserverListThreadSafe
// If the observer to be removed is in the list, RemoveObserver MUST
// be called from the same thread which called AddObserver.
void RemoveObserver(ObserverType* obs) {
- ObserverList<ObserverType>* list = NULL;
+ ObserverListContext* context = NULL;
MessageLoop* loop = MessageLoop::current();
if (!loop)
return; // On shutdown, it is possible that current() is already null.
@@ -116,24 +122,25 @@ class ObserverListThreadSafe
base::AutoLock lock(list_lock_);
typename ObserversListMap::iterator it = observer_lists_.find(loop);
if (it == observer_lists_.end()) {
- // This may happen if we try to remove an observer on a thread
+ // This will happen if we try to remove an observer on a thread
// we never added an observer for.
return;
}
- list = it->second;
+ context = it->second;
// If we're about to remove the last observer from the list,
// then we can remove this observer_list entirely.
- if (list->HasObserver(obs) && list->size() == 1)
+ if (context->list().HasObserver(obs) &&
+ context->list().size() == 1)
observer_lists_.erase(it);
}
- list->RemoveObserver(obs);
+ context->list().RemoveObserver(obs);
// If RemoveObserver is called from a notification, the size will be
// nonzero. Instead of deleting here, the NotifyWrapper will delete
// when it finishes iterating.
- if (list->size() == 0)
- delete list;
+ if (context->list().size() == 0)
+ delete context;
}
// Notify methods.
@@ -180,6 +187,23 @@ class ObserverListThreadSafe
// See comment above ObserverListThreadSafeTraits' definition.
friend struct ObserverListThreadSafeTraits<ObserverType>;
+ class ObserverListContext {
+ public:
+ ObserverListContext()
+ : message_loop_proxy_(
+ base::MessageLoopProxy::CreateForCurrentThread()) {
+ }
+
+ base::MessageLoopProxy& loop() { return *message_loop_proxy_; }
darin (slow to review) 2011/08/08 19:33:21 perhaps there is no point in these member variable
adamk 2011/08/08 19:50:04 I suppose not. Made this a struct instead (though
+ ObserverList<ObserverType>& list() { return observer_list_; }
+
+ private:
+ scoped_refptr<base::MessageLoopProxy> message_loop_proxy_;
+ ObserverList<ObserverType> observer_list_;
+
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(ObserverListContext);
+ };
+
~ObserverListThreadSafe() {
typename ObserversListMap::const_iterator it;
for (it = observer_lists_.begin(); it != observer_lists_.end(); ++it)
@@ -192,13 +216,12 @@ class ObserverListThreadSafe
base::AutoLock lock(list_lock_);
typename ObserversListMap::iterator it;
for (it = observer_lists_.begin(); it != observer_lists_.end(); ++it) {
- MessageLoop* loop = (*it).first;
- ObserverList<ObserverType>* list = (*it).second;
- loop->PostTask(
+ ObserverListContext* context = (*it).second;
+ context->loop().PostTask(
FROM_HERE,
NewRunnableMethod(this,
&ObserverListThreadSafe<ObserverType>::
- template NotifyWrapper<Method, Params>, list, method));
+ template NotifyWrapper<Method, Params>, context, method));
}
}
@@ -206,7 +229,7 @@ class ObserverListThreadSafe
// ObserverList. This function MUST be called on the thread which owns
// the unsafe ObserverList.
template <class Method, class Params>
- void NotifyWrapper(ObserverList<ObserverType>* list,
+ void NotifyWrapper(ObserverListContext* context,
const UnboundMethod<ObserverType, Method, Params>& method) {
// Check that this list still needs notifications.
@@ -219,19 +242,19 @@ class ObserverListThreadSafe
// have been removed and then re-added! If the master list's loop
// does not match this one, then we do not need to finish this
// notification.
- if (it == observer_lists_.end() || it->second != list)
+ if (it == observer_lists_.end() || it->second != context)
return;
}
{
- typename ObserverList<ObserverType>::Iterator it(*list);
+ typename ObserverList<ObserverType>::Iterator it(context->list());
ObserverType* obs;
while ((obs = it.GetNext()) != NULL)
method.Run(obs);
}
// If there are no more observers on the list, we can now delete it.
- if (list->size() == 0) {
+ if (context->list().size() == 0) {
{
base::AutoLock lock(list_lock_);
// Remove |list| if it's not already removed.
@@ -239,16 +262,15 @@ class ObserverListThreadSafe
// See http://crbug.com/55725.
typename ObserversListMap::iterator it =
observer_lists_.find(MessageLoop::current());
- if (it != observer_lists_.end() && it->second == list)
+ if (it != observer_lists_.end() && it->second == context)
observer_lists_.erase(it);
}
- delete list;
+ delete context;
}
}
- typedef std::map<MessageLoop*, ObserverList<ObserverType>*> ObserversListMap;
+ typedef std::map<MessageLoop*, ObserverListContext*> ObserversListMap;
- // These are marked mutable to facilitate having NotifyAll be const.
base::Lock list_lock_; // Protects the observer_lists_.
ObserversListMap observer_lists_;
const NotificationType type_;
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | base/observer_list_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698