Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(12189)

Unified Diff: content/common/notification_service.cc

Issue 7327007: Moving notification types which are chrome specific to a new header file chrome_notification_type... (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src/
Patch Set: '' Created 9 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/common/notification_service.cc
===================================================================
--- content/common/notification_service.cc (revision 91771)
+++ content/common/notification_service.cc (working copy)
@@ -24,18 +24,12 @@
NotificationService::NotificationService() {
DCHECK(current() == NULL);
-#ifndef NDEBUG
- memset(observer_counts_, 0, sizeof(observer_counts_));
-#endif
-
lazy_tls_ptr.Pointer()->Set(this);
}
void NotificationService::AddObserver(NotificationObserver* observer,
NotificationType type,
const NotificationSource& source) {
- DCHECK(type.value < NotificationType::NOTIFICATION_TYPE_COUNT);
-
// We have gotten some crashes where the observer pointer is NULL. The problem
// is that this happens when we actually execute a notification, so have no
// way of knowing who the bad observer was. We want to know when this happens
@@ -60,8 +54,6 @@
void NotificationService::RemoveObserver(NotificationObserver* observer,
NotificationType type,
const NotificationSource& source) {
- DCHECK(type.value < NotificationType::NOTIFICATION_TYPE_COUNT);
-
// This is a very serious bug. An object is most likely being deleted on
// the wrong thread, and as a result another thread's NotificationService
// has its deleted pointer in its map. A garbge object will be called in the
@@ -87,7 +79,6 @@
const NotificationDetails& details) {
DCHECK(type.value > NotificationType::ALL) <<
"Allowed for observing, but not posting.";
- DCHECK(type.value < NotificationType::NOTIFICATION_TYPE_COUNT);
// There's no particular reason for the order in which the different
// classes of observers get notified here.
@@ -128,7 +119,7 @@
lazy_tls_ptr.Pointer()->Set(NULL);
#ifndef NDEBUG
- for (int i = 0; i < NotificationType::NOTIFICATION_TYPE_COUNT; i++) {
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < observer_counts_.size(); i++) {
if (observer_counts_[i] > 0) {
// This may not be completely fixable -- see
// http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=11010 .
@@ -138,7 +129,7 @@
}
#endif
- for (int i = 0; i < NotificationType::NOTIFICATION_TYPE_COUNT; i++) {
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < observers_.size(); i++) {
NotificationSourceMap omap = observers_[i];
for (NotificationSourceMap::iterator it = omap.begin();
it != omap.end(); ++it)

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698