Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(851)

Issue 7309012: Don't try to build d8 from profiler tick processor scripts. (Closed)

Created:
9 years, 5 months ago by mnaganov (inactive)
Modified:
9 years, 5 months ago
Reviewers:
Vitaly Repeshko
CC:
v8-dev
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Don't try to build d8 from profiler tick processor scripts. As described in the issue 1532, this may lead to building a 32-bit version over existing x64-bit. It's better delegate to delegate this task to an user. R=vitalyr@chromium.org BUG=1532 Committed: http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=8530

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+4 lines, -6 lines) Patch
M tools/linux-tick-processor View 1 chunk +4 lines, -6 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
mnaganov (inactive)
9 years, 5 months ago (2011-07-04 21:27:16 UTC) #1
Vitaly Repeshko
LGTM Do we need some benchmarking infrastructure updates after this change?
9 years, 5 months ago (2011-07-04 22:49:50 UTC) #2
mnaganov (inactive)
9 years, 5 months ago (2011-07-05 05:25:11 UTC) #3
On 2011/07/04 22:49:50, Vitaly Repeshko wrote:
> LGTM
> 
> Do we need some benchmarking infrastructure updates after this change?

As far as I can see from its sources, d8 is either built together with a VM, or
is pre-built. Anyway, on Windows the tick processor never builds d8, and this
model works just fine.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698