Stop using with explicitly to implement try/catch.

Stop using with explicitly to implement try/catch.

The AST for TryCatch gives us enough structure that we do not need to expand
it to explicitly include a with.  Try/catch is still handled the same as
before at runtime.

R=ager@chromium.org
BUG=
TEST=

Committed: http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=8224

[Kevin Millikin (Chromium), 2011-06-08 12:47:48]

This needs void push(Handle<Object) for the other platforms before committing.

http://codereview.chromium.org/7134014/diff/1/src/parser.cc
File src/parser.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/7134014/diff/1/src/parser.cc#newcode2110
src/parser.cc:2110: inner_finally->AddStatement(new(zone())
WithExitStatement());
I'm still using WithExitStatement here.  I'll rename it to something like
PopContextStatement (suggestions?) in a later change.

[Mads Ager (chromium), 2011-06-08 13:27:46]

LGTM

http://codereview.chromium.org/7134014/diff/1/src/parser.cc
File src/parser.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/7134014/diff/1/src/parser.cc#newcode2092
src/parser.cc:2092: // Rewrite the catch body B to a single statement block
Indentation.

http://codereview.chromium.org/7134014/diff/1/src/parser.cc#newcode2110
src/parser.cc:2110: inner_finally->AddStatement(new(zone())
WithExitStatement());
On 2011/06/08 12:47:49, Kevin Millikin wrote:
> I'm still using WithExitStatement here.  I'll rename it to something like
> PopContextStatement (suggestions?) in a later change.

PopContextStatement seems reasonable to me.