Index: chrome/browser/policy/cloud_policy_controller.cc |
diff --git a/chrome/browser/policy/cloud_policy_controller.cc b/chrome/browser/policy/cloud_policy_controller.cc |
index 8c3ba08c9d3518cbfb1c9ea1518b376c636c6176..1d630cf0fb389d39473ae1bd69a3d509c5781002 100644 |
--- a/chrome/browser/policy/cloud_policy_controller.cc |
+++ b/chrome/browser/policy/cloud_policy_controller.cc |
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ |
#include "chrome/browser/policy/cloud_policy_subsystem.h" |
#include "chrome/browser/policy/device_management_backend.h" |
#include "chrome/browser/policy/device_management_service.h" |
+#include "chrome/browser/policy/enterprise_metrics.h" |
#include "chrome/browser/policy/proto/device_management_constants.h" |
// Domain names that are known not to be managed. |
@@ -112,8 +113,11 @@ void CloudPolicyController::HandlePolicyResponse( |
cache_->SetPolicy(response.response(0)); |
SetState(STATE_POLICY_VALID); |
} else { |
+ em::LogPolicyOperation(em::kPolicyFetchBadResponse); |
kmixter1
2011/06/28 01:06:02
Have we considered/investigated a paging/escalatio
Joao da Silva
2011/06/30 12:57:00
AFAIK that hasn't been discussed yet. It would be
kmixter1
2011/06/30 23:28:59
Once this hits stable, we should present these in
|
SetState(STATE_POLICY_UNAVAILABLE); |
} |
+ } else { |
+ em::LogPolicyOperation(em::kPolicyFetchBadResponse); |
} |
} |