Chromium Code Reviews| Index: src/x64/full-codegen-x64.cc |
| diff --git a/src/x64/full-codegen-x64.cc b/src/x64/full-codegen-x64.cc |
| index 329fd18dc47cbbde28cd7a16e274d84159cda4e1..78ae5ddbe8b49cdbbc600ba4e60283af4f1c2f18 100644 |
| --- a/src/x64/full-codegen-x64.cc |
| +++ b/src/x64/full-codegen-x64.cc |
| @@ -131,11 +131,11 @@ void FullCodeGenerator::Generate(CompilationInfo* info) { |
| } |
| #endif |
| - // Strict mode functions need to replace the receiver with undefined |
| - // when called as functions (without an explicit receiver |
| - // object). rcx is zero for method calls and non-zero for function |
| - // calls. |
| - if (info->is_strict_mode()) { |
| + // Strict mode functions and builtins need to replace the receiver |
| + // with undefined when called as functions (without an explicit |
| + // receiver object). rcx is zero for method calls and non-zero for |
| + // function calls. |
|
Lasse Reichstein
2011/05/26 08:26:55
Do we know, or could we make sure we know, that th
Mads Ager (chromium)
2011/05/26 10:14:07
Yes, we could. Currently, we use a valid smi which
|
| + if (info->is_strict_mode() || info->is_es5_native()) { |
| Label ok; |
| __ testq(rcx, rcx); |
| __ j(zero, &ok, Label::kNear); |