Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(721)

Issue 7038053: Implementation of SecureP2PSocket (Closed)

Created:
9 years, 7 months ago by Alpha Left Google
Modified:
9 years, 5 months ago
Reviewers:
Sergey Ulanov, awong, Wez
CC:
chromium-reviews, jamiewalch+watch_chromium.org, hclam+watch_chromium.org, simonmorris+watch_chromium.org, wez+watch_chromium.org, Paweł Hajdan Jr., dmaclach+watch_chromium.org, garykac+watch_chromium.org, lambroslambrou+watch_chromium.org, pam+watch_chromium.org, ajwong+watch_chromium.org, sergeyu+watch_chromium.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Implementation of SecureP2PSocket Implement encryption on UDP for chromoting. BUG=None TEST=None Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=90606

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : just a few files #

Patch Set 3 : only remoting changes #

Patch Set 4 : done again #

Patch Set 5 : merged and clean #

Patch Set 6 : use Encryptor CTR #

Total comments: 26

Patch Set 7 : fixed comments #

Patch Set 8 : test for retry #

Total comments: 4
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+513 lines, -0 lines) Patch
A remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.h View 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 chunk +84 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc View 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 chunk +303 lines, -0 lines 4 comments Download
A remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket_unittest.cc View 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 chunk +122 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M remoting/remoting.gyp View 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 chunks +4 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 10 (0 generated)
Alpha Left Google
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-02 00:58:06 UTC) #1
Alpha Left Google
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-22 22:03:12 UTC) #2
Sergey Ulanov
http://codereview.chromium.org/7038053/diff/10001/remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc File remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/7038053/diff/10001/remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc#newcode14 remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc:14: using net::IOBuffer; not needed because you include io_buffer.h. http://codereview.chromium.org/7038053/diff/10001/remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc#newcode28 ...
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-22 23:51:35 UTC) #3
Alpha Left Google
http://codereview.chromium.org/7038053/diff/10001/remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc File remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/7038053/diff/10001/remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc#newcode14 remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc:14: using net::IOBuffer; On 2011/06/22 23:51:35, sergeyu wrote: > not ...
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-23 21:53:01 UTC) #4
Sergey Ulanov
http://codereview.chromium.org/7038053/diff/10001/remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc File remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/7038053/diff/10001/remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc#newcode14 remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc:14: using net::IOBuffer; On 2011/06/23 21:53:01, Alpha wrote: > On ...
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-23 23:12:45 UTC) #5
Alpha Left Google
updated with test for the retry case.
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-24 00:08:02 UTC) #6
Alpha Left Google
On 2011/06/24 00:08:02, Alpha wrote: > updated with test for the retry case. ping.
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-24 18:52:35 UTC) #7
Sergey Ulanov
LGTM http://codereview.chromium.org/7038053/diff/16001/remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc File remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/7038053/diff/16001/remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc#newcode198 remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc:198: if (ret == net::ERR_INVALID_RESPONSE) nit: Add comment explaining ...
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-24 19:15:26 UTC) #8
Wez
http://codereview.chromium.org/7038053/diff/16001/remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc File remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/7038053/diff/16001/remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc#newcode16 remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc:16: namespace remoting { nit: Add a blank line after ...
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-24 23:23:51 UTC) #9
Sergey Ulanov
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-24 23:36:40 UTC) #10
http://codereview.chromium.org/7038053/diff/16001/remoting/protocol/secure_p2...
File remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/7038053/diff/16001/remoting/protocol/secure_p2...
remoting/protocol/secure_p2p_socket.cc:16: namespace remoting {
On 2011/06/24 23:23:51, Wez wrote:
> nit: Add a blank line after namespace foo {.
IMO it is not necessary in case of nested namespaces like remoting::protocol.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698